The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3346 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
Sorry, what was the total cost?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
Convener, may I ask about another point that has already come up? Mr Smith, I think that you said that £300,000 had been spent on foreign travel in one year. To the best of your knowledge, is that situation continuing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
Okay. I read the Government’s report on the hydro nation project, which I think is best explained by saying that it is Scottish Water—is it just the commission, or is it Scottish Water?—working with other countries, presumably to help them to improve the way they run their water industry. Is that fair?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
Who sent the email to the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
So, the director of corporate and international affairs sent the email on behalf of the chief executive, saying, “Don’t worry—our audit and risk committee knows all about this.”
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
So we have five of those corporate credit cards, with no apparent limit on what can be spent on them. You mentioned that one particular meal cost £200 per person. Was that for the former chief executive and a guest?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
If I was doing that job in New Zealand, I might be querying why we were having to take advice from the other side of the world on how to run our water industry.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
I think that the convener picked up on this, but you also mentioned dubiety over who knew what about the Harvard trip. I am struggling to understand that. Is it a case of you not getting straight answers to straight questions?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
My final question is about the tax bill that the commission is going to pick up. There is a tab for payments that staff had been asked to pay. Do we know what the total bill is?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Graham Simpson
I thank Stephen Kerr for bringing the debate to the chamber, and I welcome the tone of the debate so far.
I, too, was disappointed to hear the announcement by Petroineos last year. Like Stephen Kerr, I would like the refinery to continue operating. If there is any way to achieve that, we should do it. Stephen Kerr is absolutely right that this matter needs to involve both Governments. The UK Government certainly has a strong role to play, but so does the Scottish Government. They need to work together.
Michelle Thomson—it was a privilege to be a member of the Economy and Fair Work Committee with her—referred to our report on a just transition for the Grangemouth area. It contained a number of recommendations, one of which was about the Grangemouth future industry board, which has already been mentioned. It is fair to say that, as a committee, we were very frustrated that there was no private sector involvement with the board and, frankly, we found it to be rather secretive. In the words of the report:
“the Committee calls for more clarity on the role and purpose of GFIB and what it is intended to achieve”.
When I was on the committee, I repeatedly mentioned the role of sustainable aviation fuel. I probably raised it at every meeting and bored the pants off members, who, at that point, might not have known what I was on about, although eventually they did, because now everybody is mentioning SAF.
SAF could provide a future for Grangemouth, or a part of its future. My frustration is that, as Michelle Thomson has already said, Grangemouth has not been one of the places that have been earmarked to produce SAF. Frankly, somewhere in Scotland should be making it, but, at the moment, there is nowhere.
We came up with the recommendation that there needs to be legislation
“for a price support mechanism for SAF to accompany the mandate”,
because that
“may be required to incentivise private sector investment in UK and Scottish SAF production”.
In other words, the Government—the UK Government, in this case—needs to create a market for SAF. I gave Graham Stuart quite a grilling when he appeared before the committee—rightly so, as that is my job. The UK Government really needs to do that, because we need to create a market for SAF.
We need to look not just at SAF but at hydrogen, as there are also opportunities there. I am not completely downcast about Grangemouth. I am disappointed with the announcement that was made, but Grangemouth can have a strong future.
Nobody in the debate has yet mentioned the Grangemouth flood protection scheme, which is really important for the wider economy. Michelle Thomson and others know that I have recently written to Màiri McAllan about that. She has responded to me, and I have shared her response with others. She has committed to setting up a task force. [Interruption.] Mr Lumsden is groaning, but I think that, if he sees the letter, which I am happy to share with him, he will see that the tone was quite positive. I would like that task force to be set up, and I want the UK Government to be involved, too, because that scheme needs to go ahead.
13:09