The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1857 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
You are in front of me and he is not. I am asking you about your bill.
I have two more short questions. I will put something to you because of your response to the convener’s question about the power to release people from prison early. He said—rightly—that that related just to Covid but that the rest of the bill is rather wider. I will read out something that you say in the delegated powers memorandum; I am not really commenting on it, but I found it curious. In your justification for using delegated powers, you say:
“In addition to Covid, there have been relatively recent outbreaks of new diseases, SARS and MERS, and instances of contamination, such as Salisbury.”
The Salisbury situation was limited to Salisbury. Why is that in there?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I am sorry, convener—I asked about a specific aspect of the bill, and I do not think that the Deputy First Minister has addressed that point. The point is—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
There has never been a need for that. You have relied on guidance. Why can you not rely on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I want to go back to the point about freeing prisoners early, because I am genuinely struggling to understand the logic of your position, Mr Swinney. Obviously, we do not want to be in the position of freeing people early, but your position appears to be that, if that is Covid related, we should consider doing that, and if it is not Covid related, we should not consider it.
Earlier, I read out a quote from your delegated powers memorandum. I will read out another bit:
“Delegated powers are appropriate to deal with future public health threats that could pose a significant risk to human health as they are, by their nature, unpredictable and sometimes unforeseeable.”
Your rationale for the entire bill is that the powers are needed because we do not know what will happen in the future; that could be the stuff that you listed in that document or something else. However, when it comes to releasing prisoners early, you want to restrict that power just to Covid-related matters. There appears to be no logic to that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
It is an illogical position. It would be more logical to remove that provision entirely from the bill.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Did the instrument appear in the committee papers a couple of weeks ago, or was that something similar?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I would not expect you to do that. I am trying to get to a point where we move on from our report and your response. The committee said that, when you use the made affirmative procedure, there should be a statement as to why you believe that the matter is urgent. In your response, you say:
“My view is that the Scottish Government already provides a clear explanation of its rationale for urgency”.
However, you go on to say that you are
“happy to work with the Committee to consider how that could be better codified in practice”.
I am keen to find out how we can work together to get to a point at which you provide something that is, in my view, better than what you do at the moment, and we have a proper explanation of why something is urgent.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
In my final question, I will go back to what I asked you about last week—the regulations to close school boarding and student accommodation. Last week, we spoke about your desire for that power to last for an extra six months, even though the Government has never used it. Now you want to have that power permanently. How do you justify having that power permanently when it has never been used or needed?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Having gone through the letter that the committee received from you yesterday, it seems to me that its general tone, and your view, appears to be that the Scottish Government is not doing much wrong in respect of the made affirmative procedure. Considering the committee’s report and the debate that we had in the chamber, I was—I will be honest—disappointed when I read the letter, as you do not seem to accept much of what the committee said. If you think that I have got that wrong, please say so.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Hello again, Mr Swinney.