The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2811 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
I will stick to the workforce, because the report says that
“14 per cent of officers are on modified duties”,
which is up 60 per cent since 2022-23. That is quite a big number. Nine per cent are officers on modified duties who are “not deployable”. Can you explain what you mean by “modified duties”? Maybe it is obvious—someone is not doing the job that they were originally doing—but there must be reasons for that. Are they health reasons? Are people being deliberately moved into other roles? Why are 9 per cent of officers not deployable?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
How are those individuals appointed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
That is useful.
You also mentioned the existence of a culture dashboard. What is that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
What kind of cultural issues are those?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
It is pretty meaningless unless we know that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
That is quite an important detail, is it not? We need to know that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
The figure seems quite high to me. It has gone up 60 per cent in just a few years. Why do you think that it has gone up so much?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Convener, I could talk about this for hours, but I will not. Somebody else needs to get a shot.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Graham Simpson
I did not want to dwell on this subject, because there are loads of other things that we could ask about, but I am not getting the assurance that, if the yard comes to the Government in another six months’ time and says, “Sorry, lads, we need another £15 million,” you are going to turn around and say no. You will say, “Okay, here, have it—but finish the vessel.”
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Graham Simpson
I have one more thing that I want to ask about: agency staff. A specific case was identified of a previous employee who was engaged for four months on a part-time basis through an agency at a cost of £85,612. That was then subject to further direct awards; the appointment was extended to 10 months, with the total cost ending up at £220,689. It was a technical role, related to the closure of the European structural and investment funds; apparently, a value for money case was made, but that is an extraordinary sum for taking on somebody from an agency. How can we be assured that this kind of thing is not going to happen again and that those kinds of figures are not going to be spent?