The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3346 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
So the statement in the report could be true.
I have a question for SEPA—that is you, Ms Paterson. Are you aware of any building projects that have been blocked because of a SEPA objection on the basis of the risk of flooding?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Such schemes are often not within the curtilage of one landowner—they might cover an estate—so paragraph 32 is saying that the legislation is not clear on who is responsible for maintaining them. Do you accept that point?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to quote a couple of other things from the report. First—this relates to an earlier question from the convener—paragraph 32 says:
“Not all critical responsibilities for managing flood risk are covered by legislation. For example, the Act does not set out who is responsible for the maintenance of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems and for managing erosion enhanced flooding (Exhibit 2). This could mean important areas of activity may be missed.”
Do any of you know who is responsible? Mr Flucker, I am looking at you and you are looking at me, so perhaps you can answer.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Many thanks indeed. I will not take six minutes, because I normally get two minutes these days, but I will take interventions—including from Mr Findlay, if he wishes to make one, because I was not able to take one from him yesterday.
I thank Douglas Ross for bringing the bill to this point. A lot of work goes into bringing a member’s bill to stage 1. Douglas has worked with the very impressive Annemarie Ward, who is at the back of the chamber. We should congratulate her, too.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I do not know whether that is true, but I take the point. The member might be on to something, because it is strange that the SNP is set to vote against the bill. All that we are voting for today are the general principles. It is the same as with any bill. If a bill needs to be changed, that is what stages 2 and 3 are for.
Before I get into the meat of my speech, I want to say how powerful Annie Wells’s speech was. It was probably the best speech that I have heard from Annie Wells among a number of very powerful speeches that she has given. That was her best.
Drugs deaths are Scotland’s shame and today could be a day of shame for the Parliament if we vote the bill down at this point, because it is about something that the public believe should exist. If someone asks for help with addiction, they should get it, but right now that is not how our system works. That is why we have the worst drug deaths record in Europe.
We have around 500 rehab beds in Scotland, but only 140 are funded and accessible. The rest belong to charities or private providers, and they are shared with people who are seeking help for alcohol. Meanwhile, 28,600 people are on long-term methadone or buprenorphine, so that is one publicly funded rehab bed for every 200 people on methadone, never mind people with an alcohol addiction or an addiction to other non-opiate drugs.
We have already heard mention of the Thistle drug consumption facility, and the question was raised whether anyone has actually recovered through going to that facility. I think that the answer is no, but I will tell you what we have nearby. I saw shocking scenes on social media—
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Allow me to finish this. I saw on social media shocking scenes near that facility just the other day, with needles scattered everywhere and a tree with needles stuck in it. We will call it the needle tree. It is a monument to despair and death, and that is shocking. I will take the intervention.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I have not seen any evidence that it is helping people to recover, and surely that is what we need to be doing.
Eighty per cent of consultation respondents backed the bill, but the committee chose to hear mainly from those who oppose it, and they are the very institutions whose policies have failed.
Here is the question: are we going to stand with failing systems or with the people who still believe that recovery is possible? If the bill needs to be refined—and Douglas Ross accepts that it needs refining—we do that at stage 2, even if it needs massive change. That is what the process is for.
Recovery should be not a privilege but a right. If we can make housing and education legal rights, we can make recovery a legal right. I say to the members who are being instructed to vote no today that they should show some backbone, give people a fighting chance and support the bill at stage 1. Do the right thing.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I would be delighted to.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Graham Simpson
On that point, you are saying that this was a one-off. The year that we are discussing is the only year for which there has been no budget.