The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2702 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Stuart McMillan mentioned paragraph 16, which mentions people waiting for their children to be diagnosed for things such as autism. Do we have any data on how many children are on the waiting list for such a diagnosis and whether that has got worse year on year?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
It is across the piece.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
So you do not have that data.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
The convener invited me to ask about funding, so I guess that I had better do that or I will incur his wrath, and I do not want to do that.
Your briefing notes that
“Funding allocation methodologies for councils do not reflect the ASL legislation, the presumption of mainstreaming and the continued growth in recorded additional support needs.”
How does that misalignment impact councils’ ability to deliver adequate support for pupils with ASL needs?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
On outcomes, are you suggesting that councils should be tracking the money that has gone in and whether it has had an impact on individual children? Is that what you are looking for?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
I note that you are not here to answer for the project board. It can do that itself and explain why it is moving at a certain speed or lack of speed, but it is not for you to explain that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. It would be useful to have that information, because all members of the committee will have had cases where very anxious parents cannot get a diagnosis for their children, and then the children may not end up with the support that they require.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
What do we actually mean by additional support for learning? Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that it covers a wide spectrum of needs, from the very severe to the child who may just need a bit of extra help in one particular subject for a few months, which might get them to where they need to be. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
I am just reflecting on all of that. Given that the graph in exhibit 3 shows that the number of pupils receiving ASL has been going up, year on year, is there a danger that we could end up with the impression that we have a nation of youngsters who need extra help when, actually, there is a broad spectrum of need? That goes back to the point about data. Should we not be breaking that down a bit more, so that we do not end up with that probably false impression?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Indeed. Yoshiko, I want to go back to what you said much earlier about data. What data do you feel is missing? What data ought we to be capturing?