Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 8 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1865 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

Minister, you will be aware—because you will have read it in the committee’s report—that the Auditor General has been frustrated at the lack of powers that he has to get to the bottom of where £128 million was spent by FMEL. He has asked for more powers, and the committee has written to Neil Gray about the issue. I wonder what your thoughts are on whether the Auditor General should have those extra powers.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

Okay. So, essentially, we will have to wait and see what Neil Gray says.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

Has Mr Smith been asked to look at whether there was fraud? Nobody has alleged fraud.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

When are we going to see that report?

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

The scheme was launched in July, so the Government had a bit of time to engage with its UK counterparts, at least to find out the details and how it could help in the future.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

Okay. That is good to know. Now that I have alerted them to the scheme being in existence, we can make contact.

I want to move on—

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

I completely understand that it is complex and difficult, but you need to do it. Have you discussed with Audit Scotland how you are going about that, and are you asking it at every step what the right way to do it is? You do not want to be in a position in which Audit Scotland has said, “Sorry, you’ve done that the wrong way. Go away and do it again.” and we are back here again in a year’s time.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

I want to follow up on that. Sarah Jane Hannah, when will this exercise be completed? Regardless of whether you think that it is worth while doing, you are doing it. When will it be finished?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

I thought that you said that it was going to be late.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Graham Simpson

I am sure that you watched, as I did, the BBC “Disclosure” programme on the issue, which I think was broadcast a year and a day ago. In that programme, the allegation was that the whole procurement process was “rigged”. That is the word that was used in the programme.

Then, Barry Smith KC was appointed to look into the allegations that were made in the programme. However, it has been reported that Mr Smith has not been asked to look at whether the contract was rigged but instead has been asked to look at whether there was fraud. That is not what I am saying but what is being reported in the press. Is that accurate? What has he been asked to do?