The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2216 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I put that question to you. I throw it out to the committee. If the committee is thinking that way, it needs to consider that if we are going to do something with the regional element, we would have to look at the constituency element as well. Otherwise, it is not fair.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am not sure that I understand that question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Correct. It is not for me to get into individual court cases. I mentioned that particular case because it happened and serious offences were involved. To merit that somebody be jailed for six months, the crime would have to be of a sufficient seriousness. However, I do not think that we should list in the bill the offences that would be covered.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I will bring in Ben on that one, because we have covered that issue in the policy memorandum.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I suppose that it is about all of those, but, ultimately, the first stage is an MSP not performing properly or breaking the rules. The misconduct would come first, otherwise none of this applies. If people behave as they should, none of this applies. Ultimately, if the bill goes through, I would love it just to sit there and never be used, with people wondering why it is there, because everyone is behaving. But life is not like that. You know that. We are all human. At some point, somebody will misbehave, and, although the legislation would be a deterrent, somebody will fall foul of it at some point.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I understand the point that you are making very well. If we were to have a recall vote, it is inevitable that people might not be going to the place that they are used to. In a normal election, there are quite a lot of places where people go to vote, but there would be fewer under this system, so people would inevitably be asked to go somewhere different.
People could also use a postal vote, which would address the privacy issue that is a concern, particularly at the first stage, when people are voting only to say that a member should be subject to a recall vote. Postal votes could therefore be available.
If we expect people to go somewhere that they are not used to, it is a matter of communication, information and education.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am dealing with people who fall foul of the rules. In relation to the whips, I am glad that I do not have to answer to you, Ms Mackay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I would not recommend that, but they could do that. They could just take the huff and say, “I’m not coming in.”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It would be very difficult to set out in the bill a list of offences that would lead to the removal of a member, which is why I have gone for an actual term. The background to that is the case of Bill Walker, a former MSP and the only MSP whom I will name during this meeting. It was a high-profile case. He was jailed for wife beating—for exactly 12 months but not more than that, so he could not be removed. There you had somebody who was jailed for extremely serious offences but could not be removed. Although he ultimately stood down, it seemed to me to be an absurd situation, so I thought that we should perhaps look at the matter again and reduce the specified period.
I accept that different people might have different views on whether I got that right, but that is the background to that provision. I thought that it was certainly wrong that somebody who was jailed for extremely serious offences could just stay in jail for 12 months and then return to his job.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Convener, you have raised one of the issues with which I have wrestled. I have come down on one side of the argument, but I can see the other side of the argument. We might wish to explore the issue at stage 2 or in discussions with the minister.