Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 7 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 612 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Maurice Golden

I agree with Mr Ewing and support the general idea of writing to SEPA, although perhaps not quite in the manner in which my colleague suggested. Nonetheless, the pertinent points have been made.

I think that the issue goes back to the question behind many petitions, which is about who is responsible. That question was raised earlier in relation to RAAC.

I have seen the issues that the petitioner raises in Angus. In 2023, Milton of Finavon was flooded and, a year later, no measures had been put in place to protect the community. Subsequently, in the past year, there has been some support from Angus Council as well as from Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks, for which I thank them. However, it was only by the grace of God that we did not have a bad storm season in 2024. The situation is unacceptable.

The Scottish Government has said that the governance structure for assisting communities with flood risk management is adequate, but that is not what I hear on the ground. I hear that it is slow, that there are limited opportunities for action and that no one is taking responsibility for what needs to be done. I think that, in addition to following Mr Ewing’s suggestion, we should write to the Scottish Government, asking how it is monitoring the governance structure and the interaction between communities and SEPA, local authorities and landowners, where appropriate.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Maurice Golden

I welcome those comments. We now have a situation in which Transport Scotland has acquiesced to the petitioner’s request and will run a campaign, which will be targeted at companies and the public, to raise awareness of the harms that are caused by roadside litter, with legislation being in place to penalise those who drop litter. On that basis, and in a positive sense, I recommend that we close the petition in line with rule 15.7 of standing orders.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Maurice Golden

I understand the connectivity difficulties, particularly in rural areas but even in urban ones, and I appreciate that the petitioner must be frustrated by them. Ultimately, however, and with a heavy heart, I think that we should close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has no plan to develop a distinct digital connectivity plan for the Highlands and Islands. It will publish a new Highlands and Islands plan this year—any month now—that will integrate digital connectivity with other key priorities, and it will also publish a refreshed digital strategy that will take connectivity priorities into account.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

With regard to diversion from prosecution, what support is available under compulsory supervision orders? Are there sufficient resources across the whole of Scotland to provide that support?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

I might come back to you on that because, in setting the policy, you will still be required to know what happens on the other side, even though that is not what you are delivering.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

Thank you.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

Lord Advocate, it strikes me that the presumption against prosecution in these cases is perhaps out of kilter with public opinion. After all, the scope of what we are discussing is serious violent or sexual offences. My understanding of the whole-system approach is that it focuses on early interventions being made at the first sign of difficulty, and I think that there is a logic to that, but when it comes to the most serious cases of violence and sexual offending, the crisis point has probably been reached already and therefore any consideration that is given should happen in that context. What are your thoughts on that?

09:30  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

But the presumption is that that would happen only in the most extreme examples, and the scope in that respect is seriously tight. Is that the case?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

Mr Hogg?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Maurice Golden

Yes, perhaps. However, I wonder whether we can hear from the Lord Advocate. I am aware, too, of the recent statement of prosecution policy, Lord Advocate, so perhaps you could wrap that into your response as well.