The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2425 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Okay. That is absolutely fascinating. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Yes. For many people, the value is the functionality of the thing. They are not really interested in how it is designed, how it comes together or how powerful it can be as a tool. They just want to be the end user of it. I do not know how representative that is.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
What I really want to talk about is ethics—it always creeps into the conversation; we get there eventually. How can ethics be embedded at the heart of the AI revolution? Can it or should it be? Perhaps it already is. Earlier, Heather Thomson said—I scribbled it down—that ethics should be embedded in all aspects of AI. How can that be done?
Mark Schaffer, you said in your opening remarks that corporations grabbed the whole agenda and ensconced themselves early on. They were not thinking about ethical standards. They were thinking about profit, control and influence and all the rest of it. Can we truly embed ethics into AI, or must we rely on, for example, governance or regulatory measures in order to throw some kind of protective blanket over it?
I would be pleased to hear your thoughts on how we do that. You started this, Heather, so you can go first. I add that I have never seen an ethical computer algorithm yet.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Should it be more of a voluntary thing, with some sections of society deciding that they will engage in that way, or does there need to be an overarching framework that everyone should observe? You mentioned Grok earlier. Is there an ethical component to Grok?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Steven Grier can have the last word.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Will the pupils of the future have their own personalised AI bots that look after their individual educational development journeys?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
You can tell us about that later.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
That is why I am asking it.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Finally, a number of colleagues around the table mentioned education. What would be the direction of travel were an AI component included within education? The briefing paper from our friends at the Alan Turing Institute told us that 49 per cent of the time that is spent on activities in education could be better supported using generative AI tools.
I invite you to gaze forward and say what education might look like in the immediate future if AI should become more embedded as a tool for learners and teachers and for the activities that are traditionally used to engage people in education. What might AI become if it is deployed sensibly and ethically in the education setting?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning, everybody. This has been a fantastic conversation. I will start where Steven Grier ended a wee while ago, on the subject of computing. How to encourage and keep girls in science has perplexed everyone for many years, and we still do not know the answer. It seems that, when girls transition from primary to secondary school, they lose interest in science, and it is as though computing becomes akin to the oily rag. Mechanics, engineering, software engineering and computing seem to turn young girls off.
Last week, Sarah Ronald talked about her company, where younger women really excel at data analytics and like that side of computing science, whereas the younger guys like to be the coders and the programmers. I do not know how true that is in general, but that is her experience. Is there a magic wand for how to persuade more young women to stick with computing? I think that the idea of calling it “digital design” is fantastic.