Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2297 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you very much for that.

My other question was on interventions and their costs. We had some evidence about the extremely high cost of some interventions—witnesses told us that the Reidvale intervention cost £0.5 million and the Wishaw one cost £400,000. The discussion that the committee then had was about value for money and justification for such high levels of cost, and about whether those costs are capped and, ultimately, who pays for the intervention that is passed on to tenants. I would like to get your thoughts on the intervention process and whether any careful scrutiny and monitoring need to take place of whether the public is getting value for money from those high costs.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you for that clarification. Is it the regulator’s view that that money was well spent and that the outcomes for tenants were positive enough?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

I invite you to say a few words about compliance, which is another issue that has been brought to the committee In its evidence, Co-operatives UK told us that it thought that the regulator focuses a bit too much on compliance, to the exclusion of, let us say, enabling and facilitating innovation. It pointed to differences between the regulatory framework as it applies to bigger associations and to smaller ones, and asked, I suppose, whether one size fits all. What are your views on that? Is the compliance regulatory framework flexible enough to allow development, growth and innovation to take place?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

It said, for example, that housing co-ops are a different model from other housing management systems, and that smaller associations sometimes feel overburdened by the regulatory framework that impacts on them, whereas larger organisations can cope pretty well.

I suppose that the question for you is whether you apply flexibility in how you deal with smaller housing co-ops, for example, rather than just imposing on them the regulatory framework that must be obeyed. That is really where we are. They felt that there was a lack of flexibility on your part in dealing with them.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

Would you say that cost of the two that I mentioned—nearly £1 million—was money well spent and that the outcomes were positive for tenants?

10:45  

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Willie Coffey

It is partly to correct the record on my part. When I was talking about the intervention costs earlier, I should have said that it was the Dalmuir Park Housing Association intervention that, according to Patrick Gilbride, who gave us the evidence, cost £500,000, not Reidvale. What was that money spent on? What benefits were accrued? Ultimately, who decides whether that intervention was value for money?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 December 2024

Willie Coffey

In the interests of balance, the purpose of the meeting is to hear the Government’s view on the late submission of some of the evidence that the committee has received, and to allow it to provide an assurance to the committee about that. I thank the minister for doing that and for attending the meeting.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Willie Coffey

Exactly, convener—thank you very much. The focus is now firmly on Ayrshire. Dave McDowall is my colleague from Ayrshire, but I think that the questions could be answered by any of the colleagues round the table. First, I remind everyone of the broad aims of the Ayrshire growth deal. The funding package includes public funding of £250 million, and it is hoped to lever in £300 million of private sector investment and to create 7,000 jobs. Those were the stated objectives around four years ago. How far down that road would you say that we are?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Willie Coffey

My last question for you is this: how well or otherwise do you think the Ayrshire growth deal interacts with neighbouring growth deals? I am thinking about the Glasgow city region deal and its Clyde metro project, the mass transit issues and so on, as well as the Borderlands growth deal, South of Scotland Enterprise and the regional funding that they get. Have we been able to link in with some of that work in order to deliver a wee bit of additional benefit for Ayrshire?