Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2297 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

What about retaining people? People come into the job market and suddenly fall back out of it for a variety of reasons. How do we tap into what those reasons are to try to make sure that people stay longer?

There are social issues surrounding productive employment, for example. Does the fund help those aspects? I am not sure. Based on your experience, do we need to do more sideways work to assist people to stay in the job market?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I want to raise a couple of points that were discussed at the most recent meeting of the new deal for business group—I have in front of me the minutes of the meeting in January. The question is probably more for Sara Thiam and Colin Borland, who are direct members of the group, but I would appreciate views from the other witnesses.

10:45  

In the budget, the Scottish Government announced funding of £62 million to support the regeneration of local and small economies by enterprise agencies. Someone at the meeting said that

“most small business members don’t see how this”

funding

“assists them”

at all, either because

“they don’t qualify for rates relief”—

which is a surprise—or because they do not

“fit the client profile of the Enterprise Agencies”.

I invite you to comment on the thinking around that. We are following the public pound here: the Government has announced funding with the purpose of helping small businesses, but members of the new deal for business group are saying that they somehow cannot access that funding. I want to try to understand why that should be and what we can do about it.

Perhaps Sara or Colin could go first.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

The issue for me is whether we are choosing the correct model to disburse the money to the small businesses that need it and whether Business Gateway would be a better model, because it is much more closely connected and aligned with constituencies such as mine that do not have the necessary engagement and relationship with enterprise agencies.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

That is really helpful. Thank you for expanding on that for members of the committee.

Emma Congreve, when the joint working group consulted on the issue, the Fraser of Allander Institute was sceptical about proposed changes to the higher band multipliers. It said:

“to take forward reforms without a revaluation just rubs salt into the wounds.”

Will you develop that line of thinking for us, please?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

My first question is for Joanne Walker. In your submission, you say that

“a property with a value at the lower end of the band generates the same tax charge as a property with a value at the higher end of the band.”

Everybody knows that, but are there any reforms that could overcome that? Would having more bands and smaller differences between bands help to address that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Thanks. Sara, do you have any comments on the bands debate?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

I will move on to the issue of low-income households. How would that group of people benefit from any revaluation scheme that might come into place? I am thinking about pensioner households in particular. If, for the sake of argument, their house is suddenly revalued at double the current value, their income will not change with respect to that, as we all know. Therefore, how would low-income and pensioner household groups benefit from a revaluation scheme, if at all?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Does revaluation mean that the system becomes more progressive, in your opinion?

10:15  

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Good morning. My first question is probably for David Phillips. I was interested in your mention of 1991 and the Soviet Union in your opening remarks. I will take you back a few years before that to 1988 and 1989 when the poll tax was introduced in Scotland. As I remember—I campaigned against it—it was a single charge. We could argue that we are where we are because of those origins.

In your submission to the committee, you suggested that council tax discounts and exemptions have distorted the use of residential property and have contributed to overcrowding and underoccupation of property. Could you develop that idea a bit more for the committee and explain the thinking behind that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Thank you. The next question is for both of you. Should councils have some power to set the multipliers between the bands? Should that be a local decision that councils can take? What risks might be associated with that?