Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2547 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 16 November 2021

Willie Coffey

We heard about difficulties when local authorities felt that there was no flexibility or discretion for them to assist companies that do not fall within the guidelines on and scope of the various schemes. If any further support funds arise, do you intend to afford local authorities a little more discretion and flexibility to look at their local situation and ensure that businesses get the help that they need?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

Good morning, everyone. We have already mentioned other forms of support and relief. Back in March, the UK Government announced a £1.5 billion fund for further reliefs for business rates, Scotland’s share of that being around £145 million, as was mentioned. We have not seen any of that money yet, but is the more targeted method of distributing that support by our councils a better way to help than to engage in an MCC appeals process?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

I want to touch base with you on the question that I asked the previous witnesses. In March, the UK Government announced a £1.5 billion business rates relief scheme. Scotland’s share of that is £145 million, but we have not received the money yet. In principle, is that a better way to target support for local businesses compared with the MCC appeals process?

The previous witnesses told us that bigger companies and businesses tend to benefit more from the appeals process. Conversely, we were told that small and medium-sized enterprises tend not to benefit—they either do not appeal at all or they are not successful when they appeal. What are your views on the two approaches that are in front of us to choose from?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

The wholesale sector has sent a submission to the committee. It was caught between a rock and a hard place during the pandemic in that it was legally able to trade and perfectly able to do so, but it had nobody to trade with. It has made the valid point that, in the absence of any clarity about the relief scheme from the UK and Scottish Governments that I mentioned, it would prefer the appeal process to remain in place. I think that it fears that it might again fall through the net and not receive any support through a relief scheme. Do you have any views on that, particularly in relation to the wholesale sector?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

The last time that we took evidence on this issue, we heard that, unlike bigger businesses, small to medium-sized enterprises tend not to use the appeals process, so there might be an imbalance with regard to the benefits of such a process. A targeted fund might, when it arrives, be a better and perhaps fairer way of distributing support around Scotland’s businesses. Perhaps Martin Clarkson, David Magor or Charles Golding can comment on that.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

That is very helpful. Thanks very much.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

If there was so little involvement by most of the principal players who should have been part of the process, who approved the budget? Do you know, Pat?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

I have a question about the online portal that the Auditor General mentioned earlier. In the Public Audit Committee, we usually receive the opposite type of reports about information and communication technology initiatives, but the online portal for PPE ordering seems to have been a success. Do you have any information on who developed it? Is it still in place and working well?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

Ultimately, the board approved a budget that it had no part in developing—neither did its audit and finance committee. However, they all collectively decided to approve it and are, I presume, running with that budget. How are they getting on? Is the budget in place and working, or is the organisation in trouble?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

Has the board recognised that these are, as the convener noted a minute or so ago, serious and major issues, and has it accepted that that is not the way to develop a budget?