The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Auditor General, your briefing also reminds us that £500 million extra was awarded to local government in 2019-20. The big question is: do you know how much of that funding was used for social care commissioning purposes—or did it find its way elsewhere?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning. Before I ask about workforce issues, Auditor General, can you say something about how the briefing complements, reflects, mirrors or does otherwise in respect of the Feeley report that was published about a year ago? How much does the briefing find itself in harmony with that report’s recommendations, and what progress has been made?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
That kind of leads into my next question. Last year, we had an evidence session on Scotland’s colleges. In it, the principal of Edinburgh College set out some of the more innovative approaches that the college is taking to address the increasing demand for a social care workforce. They include enabling students who are studying social-care related disciplines to undertake a mixture of studies, skills development and work-based opportunities, and provision of dual qualifications in childcare and social care. Is such thinking being considered across Scotland? If so, is it having a positive impact?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
I turn to the workforce issues that are mentioned in your briefing, which tells us about the difficult environment in which the paid social care workforce operates. It also refers to the increasing demand for social care, which is coupled with a wide range of recruitment and retention challenges. What has the Government been doing and what is it doing to respond to that challenge and to ensure that we increase the number of people with social care skills?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Your briefing also refers to the commitment that the Scottish Government has made to pay adult social care staff the real living wage. We are talking about wages and money now. However, that wage might still not be enough to attract people to the sector. What do you say to that?
There are also issues with career progression. people should not go in at entry level and be there for ever more; we need to think about career progression and opportunities to improve not only pay but career prospects.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
On retention, your briefing gives us a statistic that one in four staff—25 per cent—leaves within the first three months. That must be quite a worry. Will you give us more information about why that happens? Is it pandemic related or was it happening before the pandemic? What can we do to turn that around?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. My final question was going to be about the competition issue that the Auditor General raised, but I think that he has adequately covered that. If there is a more collaborative approach and people are involved at an earlier stage, we might gain more and, rather than focusing on costs, we might focus on quality.
I will hand back to the convener and allow other members to come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning to the minister and his colleagues. I have a few questions on how the Scottish housing quality standard intersects with the charter. Paragraph 4.1 of the charter states that landlords are “accountable” for the work that they do and the performance that they deliver. How, at ground level, are tenants able to hold landlords to account if they are unhappy with that performance? Is it through things such as tenant satisfaction surveys?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Should there be a direct route that any tenant who has had such an experience can take? I know that they can go and see their local councillors and talk to their MSP, or even to their member of Parliament if they want to. Nevertheless, should there be a more direct route to the regulator in instances such as the one that I described?
A related question is whether social landlords, when they allocate a property or a tenancy, give the tenant a copy of what the standard should be, so that there is almost a contract, or an agreement, between the landlord and the tenant about the condition and quality of the house that they are being offered. That is not currently done. Do you think that it might be worth considering?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Willie Coffey
You have mentioned a few times the possibility of a regulator coming in to cover the private rented sector. Do you see that merging into a unified charter, or will we continue to have two charters and two sets of applicable standards?
You and I both know that the difference in quality between social housing and some private rented sector housing is stark. Often, I find tenants coming to me from the private rented sector who are fairly shocked by the quality of the housing that they are living in. There are no applicable standards that they can discern; there is no capital programme of upgrades and maintenance for them to look forward to. Can you say a wee bit about that and about how we might want to bring the two sectors a bit closer together?