The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Willie Coffey
Looking ahead, are you confident, and can you give the committee an assurance, that you can continue to make the savings that you are making and that, after the pandemic, you can continue to deliver the quality and level of care that the public in the NHS Highland area expects?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Willie Coffey
This is my last question for the moment. Again, it is on the quality issue, which is crucial and goes to the heart of much of all this. In paragraph 62 of the report, you mention that
“the quality of fabrication was not acceptable”
and that
“vessel parts were not being built to the correct specification or standards.”
In paragraph 138, you report that Ferguson had installed
“1,400 cables that ... were too short”
and that, following a survey by the newly appointed turnaround director, all of them will have to be replaced, which will lead to more expense and more delay. The report notes that there are more than 8,000 remaining cables still to go in.
I simply ask this: who on earth sanctioned the installation of cables that were too short to do a particular job? Why did nobody spot that early on, at the outset? Why did it take a new director to come in to suddenly discover that? In your view, Auditor General, does that not point to incompetent management and construction processes from the outset?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Willie Coffey
So it was not noticeable until late on the process that the cables in the vessels were too short.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Willie Coffey
I want to follow up on Craig Hoy’s question about funding and sustainability.
If you look at the figures that the Auditor General presented to us on adult social care spend, you can see significant increases in the spend over the past 10 years—in fact, it has gone up by 22 per cent. Caroline Lamb said a moment ago that we plan to spend another 25 per cent more. The bottom-line question for me is whether the additional funding and the whole-service redesign that is coming through the national care service will be adequate to address the concerns that the Auditor General expressed about the future sustainability of the service. Could you give us your view on that, Caroline, and some reassurance, if you can?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Willie Coffey
Did you investigate why that guarantee was withdrawn within a month, or did the parties just proceed to make the best of the circumstances in which they found themselves?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Willie Coffey
On the point about the builders refund guarantee at the very beginning of the process, my understanding, having read the papers, is that, within a standard shipping model contract, such a guarantee is assumed and embedded as part of the contract agreement—so it was assumed by default that FMEL had consented to provide that 100 per cent guarantee. However, only a month later, it said that it could not do so. Is that potentially a clear case of FMEL misleading the client at the outset of the contract?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Willie Coffey
That will do for now, convener. I know that we are pressed for time.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much for that. Back to you, convener.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Willie Coffey
You also note that the Government has not been particularly clear on the level of spending that is being targeted at early intervention and prevention. Can you say a few words about that? What should the Government be doing to clarify or improve that aspect?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Willie Coffey
I heard clearly and really appreciated those good, lengthy and detailed answers. I will not pick out individual projects—I think that Craig Hoy might refer to a few key ones later on—but going back to Geoff Huggins’s comments on the benefits of good design, I would suggest that, if you have good design and a clear specification for a piece of software, you are in with a good chance of delivering on time and on budget. Is that not the case? Are you able to assure the committee that we are in a good place with the range of projects that are being worked on—a figure of more than 500 was mentioned—and that we know that the design, specifications and skills mix are good enough to deliver those projects on time and on budget? In short, are all the projects that are on our books well defined and capable of being delivered on time and on budget?