The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I will raise again the issue of the application of quality standards, which Colin Beattie led on a moment ago.
In his key messages, the Auditor General told us that some of the project milestones were not clearly defined and that there was no linkage to any quality standards that may be an accepted part of that particular industry.
Roy, do you have a view on why we were not insisting on a connection between the milestones in the project and the quality standards that should have been applicable at each point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. We can probably investigate that further in the next session.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
It is a recurring issue that, when the committee considers any project, it often finds that, if the project goes wrong at the beginning, it is unlikely to work at the end, as insufficient rigour was applied at the outset. Not applying quality standards to milestones seems to committee members to be a major issue.
Paragraph 138 of the Auditor General’s report told us that
“some of the 1,400 cables”
installed on the first boat
“were too short”.
It is amazing to members of the committee and, perhaps, the public that that was not discovered and not reported to the Parliament until the turnaround director was involved in 2022. How on earth can something like that happen? How can cables that are too short go unseen and unnoticed for nearly four years and cause a significant delay? I connect that directly with the application of quality standards and inspection. Why was that missing in this case?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Should it not? It is ridiculous to be unable to challenge the fact that cables are too short on a boat and for that to remain the position for four years until somebody else—the turnaround director—comes on the scene to identify it. Surely, we must be considering that. I am aware that the observation reports were a mechanism to raise and highlight issues. In essence, they are change requests in the quality world, and the builder might or might not have carried them out. Surely to goodness that needs to be strengthened.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Did even the builder accept that they were too short?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I have a supplementary to my colleague, Craig Hoy’s, question.
Mr Brannen, you have heard the convener raising issues about the decision-making process and record keeping. You have also heard Craig Hoy highlighting proper consideration of risk, which is central to some of the issues that we are facing. In your view, were the issues that have been raised about those two areas sufficient to have invited the Government to reach a different decision about procurement of the vessels?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Had the Government not proceeded with the procurement of the vessels, what would have been the impact and outcome?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I have a supplementary question on the convener’s line of questioning, Mr Brannen. Is the extent to which some parties are placing an emphasis on paper trails and the recording of decisions a fair reflection of how the Government works in practice? Are we dealing with the unmet expectations of some people or with failures to deliver on requirements? Which side of that line are we on? The issue has been a recurring one for the committee, and others, for some time.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Do all parties accept the point that the Auditor General made about the cables being too short, or is there some dispute about that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I do not know who sets the criteria that assessors use. Are market conditions part of their consideration? If not, should they be? You can imagine a situation in which rateable values go up and up but a lot of shops on all our high streets might remain closed. It does not seem to make sense that the RV would increase if local economic circumstances pointed us in a different direction.