Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2547 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Accounts Commission Local Government and Financial Overview Reports

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Willie Coffey

My question is for Bill Moyes and is about the levelling up fund, which is, as you know, a replacement fund for European Union funds. My other committee, the Public Audit Committee—[Inaudible.]—who will scrutinise and who will audit this. At the moment, either of the two Governments—[Inaudible.]—that there is a role for Audit Scotland or the Scottish Parliament in looking at that. Do you anticipate that, because of your closer relationship with local government, the Accounts Commission will be the body that will scrutinise and provide assurance about that fund and the spend across all the councils?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Accounts Commission Local Government and Financial Overview Reports

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Willie Coffey

So it is still unclear. Thank you.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

That is why we asked you the question. Thank you.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

You mentioned the owner observation reports. The information that we have is that there were about 346 of them and that 180 were carried out while 166 were rejected or are still outstanding. Does that fall within normal quality management procedures where the customer requests changes and the person who is delivering the contract either agrees or disagrees that they can be made? Is that where the dispute resolution issue fell? Was there a failure to agree about changes or rejected change requests? How did that work?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you for all that detail. The committee has been trying to get feedback on those issues, and your input today on the record is helping the committee to understand.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

That is at the heart of any quality control or quality management process. However, the Auditor General’s report says that there were no quality processes in place to manage such issues.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Was that process agreed in advance? If you build anything—it does not matter what it is—you are bound to get change requests as you go along.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

I will move on to my final question on the issue. The Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee report also comments that there was

“evidence that the contractor deliberately proceeded to construct specific sections of the vessel either out of sequence or not according to the proper specification”.

What is your response to that and how does that fit in a quality process?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Let me finish this, if I may, Mr McColl. You have said quite clearly that the cables were not short. Equipment was moved around, which caused the cables not to reach it.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Was there an agreement about how to approach that issue? It is at the heart of any—