The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2149 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Willie Coffey
We have touched on some of the issues under this theme with regards to partnerships, outcomes and the relationship with the third sector. I want to develop that a bit more. I will start with Paul Bradley. Is this the time—during a pandemic—to reset and re-establish the relationship between the third sector and the formal sector? Do you think that third sector organisations feel that they are always on the outside looking in?
My experience as an MSP—and as a local councillor, which I was for many years—is that we always turn to the third sector in times of need and particularly during times of emergency, as is the case currently. However, the danger is that, following such periods, we revert to the same old relationship, where the third sector is basically chasing its tail and looking for funding year to year. Is it now time to get serious about the issue and readjust, or reset, that relationship and get the most out of it that we can?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Karen Greaves, I imagine that it is the same for Orkney, where I imagine that it is essential that you do not have councillors yo-yoing and hopping about islands in order to carry out their duties. Reflecting on the Arran example that I gave, is enough weight given to that aspect—the size of the geographical area that councillors have to represent as part of their work?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Thank you, both, for those comments.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Is enough weight attached to the geographical areas that councillors have to represent? I will give you a wee example. Arran is 167 square miles, and the proposal is that a single councillor represent that huge land mass. However, the proposed ward 5 for North Ayrshire Council, which is Saltcoats and Stevenston, would have five councillors, and that looks to me to be about 15 square miles. The Arran councillor has to cover a ridiculous amount of land. Does Boundaries Scotland give enough weight to the distance that a councillor will have to travel to carry out their duties?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Karen and Maggie. Welcome to the committee. I will ask a question that does not relate to your authority areas, but I would be pleased to hear your views. The proposal for North Ayrshire and Arran is that Arran would be a single-member ward. I would like to hear your reflections on whether that kind of principle defeats the principle of proportional representation that we had hoped to introduce within councils. What is your take on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Yes—thank you, convener. My question is for Stephen Boyle and is on the inequality agenda.
Your report is good—it recognises that the gap has narrowed. That is quite clear and is to be welcomed, and I commend local authorities for it, particularly those in the group of nine that have made efforts to begin to close the gap.
However, you go on to say that closing the gap needs to happen more quickly. What are your views or recommendations on how that can happen more quickly? I sometimes wonder how on earth that can be done more quickly if the education system has done the best it can in the circumstances that it has found itself in.
You also mentioned that a further £1 billion is coming down the line to help. Do you get the sense that the Government is listening to your messaging that we need to think smarter, more cleverly and differently about how we deploy the funding to reach the communities that you, Tricia Meldrum and Zoe McGuire have mentioned? Do we need to think about how we can better shape deployment of the funding to get the quicker turnaround that you hope for?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Willie Coffey
That is really helpful. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much, convener, and good morning again, Auditor General. Could you tell us a little bit more about the response to Covid and the part that remote learning and digital technology played in that? Your message is very complimentary in recognising that there was a strong foundation there already, but could you give us your perspective on how well that worked?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Yes, it is. Did you pick up any disproportionate impact on young people who are learning from home on a device? The device is one thing—it is handy to have a device—but the connection speed from your house is another thing entirely. We have all had various experiences of that, even in Parliament. Did you pick up on any issues there that we might want to learn a few lessons from should something like this happen again?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Willie Coffey
Lastly, on that point, do you think we will keep any element of remote learning as we go forward, or will we go back to normal and have everybody in school? Will we lose the advantages that remote learning gave us when we go back?