The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Have we seen enough of that early engagement across the board? For example, the committee has seen great work in North Ayrshire on community wealth building, where the early participation of communities that Andrew Burns talked about is really paying dividends. As I understand it, great stuff is going on in Fife as well, which I think is transformative. Are you seeing enough of that across the board to push the agenda a bit faster?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Willie Coffey
All councils have an internal audit function throughout each council. For many years, when I was on the Public Audit Committee, we focused on the duties and roles of internal audit compared with external audit. Should any council’s internal audit function come up with the same ideas and proposals that are suggested in the Accounts Commission’s reports? Why should we need another layer that, in effect, says the same thing?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Is there a wee bit of work to be done in illustrating to some authorities what transformation looks like and what it means? Is there an issue there? Is that one of the barriers?
10:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Okay, great. My other question is an interesting one. It comes from what the chief executive of Clackmannanshire Council, Nikki Bridle, said last week. I had better use her words. She said that, at the same time as councils are
“transforming and reforming, our auditors ... need to be in the same space”,
and that, in terms of evaluating new and complex models,
“some of the traditional skill sets might not be as relevant”.—[Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 9 September 2025; c 44.]
I had to use the exact words—I hope you do not mind. I would be interested in your response to that comment.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Do the councils always agree with your recommendations?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Last week, Nourish Scotland spoke about the outcomes of the good food nation work. It suggested that it may appear to be confusing and contradictory that the legislation does not discuss or contain any outcomes. There could be 32 different outcomes—possibly more. Is localism the correct approach? At the end of all of this, how will any of us know whether local authorities have complied with anything if they can define and determine their own outcomes?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Are you happy with that? Allowing local authorities to determine their own pathway towards their plans seems to be a much softer approach—and it is probably the correct one. As you said, East Ayrshire Council has been doing this work, and quite well, for the past 20 years without any legislation. Looking ahead to the next few years or so, are you quite happy that, when the Government of the day looks back at the process to see whether it has been successful, the structural approach in the legislation will have been enough to deliver what you hope for?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Do other colleagues have views on what transformation looks like in their areas?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Willie Coffey
Cabinet secretary, I recently heard of a case in East Ayrshire in which a local smaller supplier bid for a particular contract but lost out to a bigger supplier that could provide a much lower price, despite all the local criteria and so on being in favour of the smaller supplier.
Do you think that the boundaries are clear enough for councils to consider bids from and offer contracts to local smaller suppliers that usually—inevitably—offer a higher price? Some councils maybe feel compelled to opt for the lower price to satisfy procurement guidelines, but there are criteria in there that would allow them to vary that, should they so choose. Do you think that that whole area is clear enough, or does it need to be tidied up in any way?