Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2155 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

For the avoidance of doubt, you are saying that the cables that were installed were not short. It is because equipment was moved around.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Was there an agreement about how to approach that issue? It is at the heart of any—

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Let me finish this, if I may, Mr McColl. You have said quite clearly that the cables were not short. Equipment was moved around, which caused the cables not to reach it.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you for that comment. There was clearly a disagreement with the committee’s findings in its report. You have made that pretty clear.

In the Auditor General’s report, there is an issue about cables in the vessel being too short. The turnaround director, when he was appointed, unearthed that issue. I want to ask you for your views on that. The report says:

“This process identified that some of the 1,400 cables that FMEL had installed at the end of 2018 were too short to reach required equipment.”

What do you say to that? How could that possibly come about if design and construction were proceeding correctly?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

I am just talking about quality processes that give an agreed framework between a client and a contractor about what to do to resolve issues. Were they in place?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

I will move on to my final question on the issue. The Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee report also comments that there was

“evidence that the contractor deliberately proceeded to construct specific sections of the vessel either out of sequence or not according to the proper specification”.

What is your response to that and how does that fit in a quality process?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

That is at the heart of any quality control or quality management process. However, the Auditor General’s report says that there were no quality processes in place to manage such issues.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Was that process agreed in advance? If you build anything—it does not matter what it is—you are bound to get change requests as you go along.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, Mr McColl. I will begin by following on from the convener’s question about the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee’s report, its comment on the

“appropriate level of design capabilities”

and so on. Clearly, you contest that finding. Did you get an opportunity to give evidence to that committee? Subsequently, when you saw the report, were you able to challenge those findings and set that out in detail?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 16 June 2022

Willie Coffey

That is why we asked you the question. Thank you.