The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2315 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Thanks for that. What I am trying to get at, I suppose, is whether Ayrshire College is a bit more pessimistic about the future or whether the other colleges would have come up with similar forecasts and projections if they had embraced similar scenarios. I am trying to burrow in to find the answer to that. You said that Ayrshire College and Glasgow Kelvin College did this work but none of the others did. If the others did a similar level of forecasting, do you think that they would arrive at a similar picture?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
The public would see the evidence of how their money is being spent, or will be spent in the coming years—is that what you are saying?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you for your responses.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. That is clear.
Does Ben Edgar-Spier want to come in, convener?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you. The second part of the question is this: how do we demonstrate the benefit? Fiona Campbell said that the levy has to be ring fenced so that it is clearly seen to be beneficial.
Stacey, do you want to come in, or do you want to respond to the previous question?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Good morning to everybody on the panel.
I want to look at the funds that could be raised through the scheme. Stacey Dingwall’s response to an earlier question touched on that. The bill makes it clear that the net proceeds of the scheme should be used for
“developing, supporting or sustaining facilities or services which are substantially for or used by persons visiting the scheme area for leisure purposes.”
Is that the correct approach? It does not specifically mention our business visitors to Scotland. Are they all correctly lumped into the same category? What are the potential on-going benefits that we should expect to see from the levy being deployed locally to develop those services? I will start with Stacey.
10:45Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Frank, you also said in your earlier answer to one of the committee members that there needs to be more of a long-term plan, rather than an annual budgetary cycle. Will you expand on what you mean by that and on what the benefits of that would be?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thanks very much, everybody, for those responses. Back to you, convener.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. Should the record-keeping, reporting and reviewing arrangements that are in the bill assist us by making it clear that the net revenues gained from the levy deliver the services that you are talking about? Stephen Young said that we might never see the benefit. Should it be clearer that the levy and the revenue that is gained from it by an authority is clearly being spent on delivering those services? Fiona Campbell said that we should ring fence it. Is it the view of the witnesses that we should be clearer about how we do that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. David Weston, did you want to come back in?