The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1519 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Do you have confidence that the SPA is getting to grips with that now?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
We will take that as a positive.
10:00
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
First, I put on the record an interest that I have: a close family member works in forensics, so I will steer clear of any questions that directly relate to that.
The first area on which I will focus is equalities. The report reminds us that, in 2023, the then chief constable—quite dramatically, as I recall—acknowledged that Police Scotland was “institutionally discriminatory and racist.” The current chief constable set out, in her 2030 vision, the commitment for Police Scotland to become
“an anti-racist and anti-discriminatory organisation”.
There are a number of on-going pieces of work, including the policing together programme, and there is a strategy in place. In spite of that, however, your report notes that Police Scotland’s internal audit in 2024 found that policing still
“does not have effective arrangements in equality and human rights impact assessments.”
It would be good to hear what your audit found with regard to what those failings are and why policing is not managing to take that forward in a way that will make effective arrangements for equality impact assessments. What is missing, and how is policing progressing with that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Did you say that you would be looking at the policing together programme again in 2027-28?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
At that point, that might be something that the Auditor General would look at.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I move on to the Police Scotland estate. You say in the report that the current estate is “unsustainable” and that
“around £500 million will be required to deliver the masterplan, with a £200 million funding gap still to be addressed.”
That is quite significant. What is being done to manage that and prioritise what needs to be done quickly over what can be done later?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I want to go back to some of Jamie Greene’s questions about the fiscal framework and the difference between the tax take and its financial benefit to Scotland. I think that Shona Riach mentioned the structural differences, one of which is the financial sector. Across the world, perhaps, but certainly in Europe, it is not unusual for financial jobs to coalesce around the capital city, because that is where the institutions are. I just want to probe that a little deeper. If we were to take London and its very overheated economy out of the fiscal framework calculations, what impact would that have?
It also seems to me that, when it comes to some of the other structural challenges that we have, one in-built challenge is that jobs in London have a London weighting, which means that someone doing exactly the same job in the civil service in London gets paid more. How can we ever overcome that, given that it is built in?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Are you confident that the tools and the relationships that you currently have provide robust answers with regard to the risks of behavioural change?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
So, there is currently no timescale. Is the issue of VAT assignment likely to be rolled into the fiscal framework discussions?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you, convener. I want to touch on an area that we did not manage to cover at the previous meeting. The archive house project was started in 2021 and a decision was taken in June 2024 to end it. It would be good to hear how much has already been spent and how much more will need to be spent before the lease break in 2029.