The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1475 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
That is the area that I was keen to go into next. There are pros and cons to the initiatives, but we often just hear the challenges of making the effort: “It is too hard to cycle” and “The LEZs are too restrictive—I cannae get to my shop.” How do we make sure that people can understand the benefits to them? We heard last week that the health benefits from the LEZs are looking good, but I still get constituents complaining that they are too restrictive and that they stop them running their business. I say to them that it looks like the LEZs are saving people’s lives and ensuring that children will not suffer lifetime breathing conditions, so we need to do more in that regard. How do we ensure that people understand the benefits to them of all the initiatives that have health and climate benefits?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I was going to ask you about place-based planning, but I think that you have covered it.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I want to explore engagement and communication, both in the health and social care sector and in communities. Has there been good engagement with the health and social care sector in developing the plan?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I will come back to you on that point, but Dr Teuton wants to add something first.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Some of my questions have been touched on already, but I will go into them in a bit more depth. It feels like there are long-standing cultural issues that existed long before the audit and the specific issues with the accountable officer, but there is also a lack of transparency. I do not see how the organisation can move forward without improving its transparency, because that is what ultimately ensures that it gains trust.
First, you mentioned the lack of a register of interests for the executive leadership team. How unusual is it for a public body that there would not be such a register at that top level?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks for that.
The next area that I will probe a little further, although it has already been covered quite a lot, is the arrangements around the electronic purchasing cards. We have talked already about the huge amount of money that was spent on those cards and the limit that was raised to more than £1,200, which seems to me an incredibly high limit for someone spending on their own initiative. As members of the Scottish Parliament, we can have a Parliament credit card, but every single payment, even if it is only £20, has to be signed off and checked by somebody else, so £1,200 seems to be a bizarrely high limit for payments. There seems to have been a complete lack of control, even if the policy had been followed, which, as we have heard, it was not.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
You said that the transactions were being checked.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I guess that that gives a little bit of assurance to the public on that point.
Do you want me to continue, convener?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
You suggested that there was not just one mistake at the start, but multiple mistakes and lots of opportunities to take a different path before more money was spent. However, we are where we are and we cannot change the past or unspend the money that has been spent. If there is one recommendation that the committee could make, what would you hope that we would come up with?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Is that what everyone thinks?