The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1393 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Will the member give way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I appreciate Jeremy Balfour’s contribution to the committee. He has made sure that we are thinking about the issues carefully. I understand Mr Balfour’s position on the bill: he does not support the bill, and I respect that. What Mr Balfour is proposing would be a new procedure for the Parliament. If we believe that we need a new procedure, the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee should consider that. However, it is not appropriate for us to bring in a new procedure to the Parliament and I do not think that it is required.
The topic that Mr Balfour is raising is one that this committee considered in great depth. We took lots of evidence at stage 1, and that is all there online for folk to look at and understand. I propose that we thank Mr Balfour for his suggestion but politely decline.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you very much—I did not want to interrupt your flow.
I am sympathetic to the amendment, but, at the start of your remarks, you mentioned that it is similar to those to, I think, clause 43 of the Westminster bill, as amended. My understanding is that that clause would apply to Scotland. Have you considered how amendments to the bill before us might interface with amendments to clauses in the Westminster bill that would apply to Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I propose that we do not write.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
This has been a really interesting discussion. Given that even Bob Doris found himself on two sides of an argument, it might be better if he does not press his amendments. I am very sympathetic to what he is trying to achieve. If he does not press his amendments and instead has that discussion, we can see whether there is a way forward and whether we can get wider support at stage 3.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I will leave it there, convener.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
The briefing suggests that some areas are already being squeezed. One area that you flag is English for speakers of other languages. There is a big push for people to be able to speak English if they decide to live here, and there is high demand for that. People who, for whatever reason, have come here want to learn English as a second language so that they can contribute more fully to our society.
How severe is the situation in that regard? There is high demand for ESOL courses, which clearly help people to contribute to our economy, but some people are not able to access those courses.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
There has been an 8 per cent reduction in staff, and I think that it has been suggested that that figure might have to be higher if some of the other pressures continue. You mentioned at the start that the experience of students is still positive. Will that continue, or will the staff reductions have other, longer-term implications? All staff reductions, whether on the teaching or the non-teaching side, have an impact on the student experience and course availability. You have said that teaching time has already gone down. What will the long-term implications be if colleges continue to go down this route?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
You mentioned in your opening remarks, and it is also mentioned on page 9 of the briefing, that there was a shift from a deficit in colleges’ funding of £14.5 million in 2022-23 to a surplus of £0.4 million in 2023-24. That represented a 2 per cent shift. The briefing goes on to mention that much of that was achieved through voluntary severance.
One argument that was made as to why colleges had to go through that painful process was that it was required in order to make their institutions sustainable for the longer term. However, it does not feel as though that has happened. Obviously, with voluntary redundancy, the biggest cost is the cost of the package, but on-going savings should be made.
I am trying to understand why a process that was predicted to help the college sector to become more sustainable, which will have caused a lot of pain to be felt by staff who were at the sharp end of it, does not appear to have resulted in a more sustainable system.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Do we need to consider a different way of funding those courses, or do you think that the Scottish Funding Council can wrestle with that?