The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1549 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Do you have a ballpark figure for that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
There have been a couple of times when more senior people were invited to give evidence, and they should have been there because they are the right people, but they have not been available. It might save your time, for instance, as you are obviously really busy. Thank you very much for that, because it is an issue for the Parliament going forward.
That is the main question that I had just now, convener; I might have some supplementaries to other folks’ questions later.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I have a quick supplementary to Colin Beattie’s questions about PFI contracts. The Government has moved away from the use of such contracts, some of which could now be regarded as historical or legacy contracts. For example, the Wishaw hospital project that you talked about predates this Parliament, yet we are still paying for it every year. Do we have a handle on how much the NHS has to pay for PFI and public-private partnership contracts every year?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
That would be helpful, because then we would know the significant amount that the NHS has to spend. Colin Beattie’s questions showed how badly written some of those contracts were in terms of value for money for our NHS, although they are historic and predate this Parliament.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
As you know, I sit on the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and there are a few times when that committee has found it difficult to obtain witnesses from health boards. This is the Public Audit Committee, but the audit function is for the whole Parliament to undertake. The issue is not just with the NHS—other committees have had challenges in getting witnesses. However, you are here today, so I ask for some assurance that you can ensure that, in the next session of Parliament, board chief executives and chairs understand the importance of engaging with the committees of the Parliament. Audit and scrutiny are good for everyone, and we should be encouraging health boards to engage with the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, because that is helpful overall. I would like some assurance on that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
It is more of a point of information related to Graham Simpson’s question on the national referral protocol. I did not do a Google search; I did a DuckDuckGo search and the information is there. All the conditions are listed and there is an app.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I understand where Graham Simpson is coming from. Obviously, he was not overly concerned about his allergic reaction, but other folk might have been, and their first instinct might have been to go to the GP. My assumption is that going to the GP would be far more expensive for the system overall, would put pressure on the GP and would prevent someone else from getting an appointment. Have you looked at the savings from pharmacy first and how much pressure it relieves in the system?
11:00
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I will pick up on the summer of sport, which Kim Atkinson mentioned. We have discussed the huge injection of funding into sport. Half of that significant amount of money is for the summer of sport, to ensure that there is a long-term legacy. Often, we wrongly think of legacy as being to do with the buildings, but, in fact, it is about the people. How can we ensure that that significant injection of funding has a legacy for the people?
It is important that, when we talk about the people, we go wider than kids and include older folk. Forbes Dunlop will be aware of the fantastic success of the swimming masters events. I want to give a shout-out to my sister, who, having got back into swimming, has just won six golds and a silver at the age of 60-whatever. How do we encourage folk of all ages to take advantage of the summer of sport to improve their access to sport and physical activity? I ask Forbes Dunlop to respond first, given that I mentioned swimming.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
:Brilliant—thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
:I have a final question for NHS Grampian. On making public services more efficient, the Government is keen that we work together across public services. Are you looking to share more of the back-office work and salaries across the two local authorities and the health board? Are you working on getting better at that?