Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 4 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1540 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

Are you confident that that part of the transparency of the process has been successful?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

You said that, if someone was underpaid, they would be compensated by 8 per cent, which seems fair. However, I am slightly concerned about the opposite situation. If someone has been overpaid, will they have to pay that back? If so, would they have to pay it back with interest? What would happen for someone in that situation?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

That would be helpful. Thank you.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

Do the individuals know that they are potentially impacted? Do they know that there is a question mark over whether they are getting the right amount?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

Would those people be expected to pay that back?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

The UK Government has set the 8 per cent rate for someone who has been underpaid. Has it also set a percentage for someone who has been overpaid?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Delayed discharges: A symptom of the challenges facing health and social care” and “Community health and social care: Performance 2025”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

Are we managing to resource that collaboration work? Time is one of the most challenging issues, so is there funding to ensure that there is time to collaborate?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Public Pensions Agency”

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

Some of my specific questions have been answered in responses to others, but I will follow on from Colin Beattie’s questions about the implications for individual members. Can you give us an idea of the scale of the impact that being on the wrong benefit could have on an individual, so that we can understand how that could impact on someone’s life—whether they are already retired and have been given the wrong pension, or are looking to retire but have been given the wrong estimates?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Food Standards Scotland and the First National Good Food Nation Plan

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Joe FitzPatrick

I will ask some questions about the food hygiene information scheme. There has been a bit of media coverage of the scheme in England, where they have a sticker that goes on the window. Obviously, it relies on the establishment to change that sticker, so that people know whether it is accurate, and I think that they are looking at moving to an online system.

We have an online system, which sounds good on the face of it—until you actually try to use it. You go to the Food Standards Scotland website and it is great. You can put in the name of a specific business or you can put in a street. I have typed in “Canongate” and asked it to tell me which businesses were assessed as having a requirement for improvement; the options are simply “pass” or “improvement required”. There are seven results, which cover a range of different food premises. There is one in particular, which I will not name but which is a pub that I would have eaten in. Edinburgh’s pub food scene is great. The inspection date is given as 4 September 2024. However, what was wrong in September 2024? Is it safe for me to eat there now? The site is meant to be about sharing information.

There is a link to the City of Edinburgh Council’s food safety website, which takes me to a general page that tells me that, if I want specific information, I have to go back to the Food Standards Scotland website. Without emailing the council’s environmental health service, therefore, I do not know whether there is a significant reason why I would not want to eat there, whether it is being fixed or whether several people have had food poisoning.

We have a system that, with modern technology, should work so that people have real choice. I am keen to encourage you to look at how that could be fixed for the future, because it is not an information system just now.