The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1540 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Are you confident that that part of the transparency of the process has been successful?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
You said that, if someone was underpaid, they would be compensated by 8 per cent, which seems fair. However, I am slightly concerned about the opposite situation. If someone has been overpaid, will they have to pay that back? If so, would they have to pay it back with interest? What would happen for someone in that situation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
That would be helpful. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Do the individuals know that they are potentially impacted? Do they know that there is a question mark over whether they are getting the right amount?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Would those people be expected to pay that back?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
The UK Government has set the 8 per cent rate for someone who has been underpaid. Has it also set a percentage for someone who has been overpaid?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Are we managing to resource that collaboration work? Time is one of the most challenging issues, so is there funding to ensure that there is time to collaborate?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Some of my specific questions have been answered in responses to others, but I will follow on from Colin Beattie’s questions about the implications for individual members. Can you give us an idea of the scale of the impact that being on the wrong benefit could have on an individual, so that we can understand how that could impact on someone’s life—whether they are already retired and have been given the wrong pension, or are looking to retire but have been given the wrong estimates?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I will ask some questions about the food hygiene information scheme. There has been a bit of media coverage of the scheme in England, where they have a sticker that goes on the window. Obviously, it relies on the establishment to change that sticker, so that people know whether it is accurate, and I think that they are looking at moving to an online system.
We have an online system, which sounds good on the face of it—until you actually try to use it. You go to the Food Standards Scotland website and it is great. You can put in the name of a specific business or you can put in a street. I have typed in “Canongate” and asked it to tell me which businesses were assessed as having a requirement for improvement; the options are simply “pass” or “improvement required”. There are seven results, which cover a range of different food premises. There is one in particular, which I will not name but which is a pub that I would have eaten in. Edinburgh’s pub food scene is great. The inspection date is given as 4 September 2024. However, what was wrong in September 2024? Is it safe for me to eat there now? The site is meant to be about sharing information.
There is a link to the City of Edinburgh Council’s food safety website, which takes me to a general page that tells me that, if I want specific information, I have to go back to the Food Standards Scotland website. Without emailing the council’s environmental health service, therefore, I do not know whether there is a significant reason why I would not want to eat there, whether it is being fixed or whether several people have had food poisoning.
We have a system that, with modern technology, should work so that people have real choice. I am keen to encourage you to look at how that could be fixed for the future, because it is not an information system just now.