The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2546 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you.
We are also joined by David Torrance, who is substituting for Collette Stevenson. David, you have previously declared any relevant interests. You are more than welcome this morning as well.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
There could be a loss of identity here. There is one stream for universal credit, another stream for another suite of income-based benefits and another stream for adult disability payment. It would be nice if those different streams lost their identities and the support was simply provided. That is something that the committee may return to at a later date, to see how that could work in practice. What you have said is quite reassuring, however.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
On reflection, I think that parliamentarians very much take a similar pathway to you, Mr Bartlett. There is no point in having an advice surgery in the same library at 2 pm once a month on a Friday if no one comes along. It is much better to be bespoke and accessible as and when you are needed. If that is the model that you seek to develop, that is welcome.
Before I let you go, I should point out that you said that we would enjoy your reports, so you have already set quite a high bar. I hope that that bit goes well.
I am mindful that you only get to put on the record answers to the questions that you are asked. We have a couple of minutes left and, given that there are no additional questions and that we did not permit you an opening statement, would you like to make any final comments?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
A wraparound welfare advice and support package would certainly be welcome.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the 33rd meeting in 2025 of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee. We have received apologies from Collette Stevenson.
Agenda item 1 is a declaration of interests. I welcome Claire Baker as a new member of the committee. It is good to have you here, Claire. I invite you to declare any interests that are relevant to the committee’s work.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
Given that monitoring and evaluation have been mentioned, that provides an almost appropriate segue for me to hand over to Jeremy Balfour.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Bob Doris
I put on record again that the committee welcomes your proactive approach to engagement thus far. Thank you for your evidence. That concludes our business in public.
09:38 Meeting continued in private until 11:28.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Bob Doris
For the record, I know that the Government does not think that the bill needs to be amended in that respect, but, as the member in charge of the bill, do you think that there is a need for greater clarity?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Bob Doris
I understand that. The word “alignment” is forming in my head. I am thinking about a situation in which the UK Government decides, perfectly reasonably, that, under its international duties, it wishes—after consulting the Scottish Government—to implement its own regime within international boundaries, beyond the Scottish Government’s direct control. If there is one regime there but a different regime within Scotland’s boundaries, is there any possibility that the UK Government could think, “We’re doing carbon capture differently beyond 200 nautical miles; at 195 nautical miles, it’s being done in a different way, so let’s align those”?
I am thinking about the idea of alignment—I am not saying that there is a danger of alignment, but we could perhaps have a situation in which there is one regime for both the international jurisdiction and the Scottish jurisdiction, as the UK Government could bring in conditions for something that is overtly devolved.
I hope that I have expressed that correctly. My question is about the idea of alignment between what we currently do within the boundary of 200 nautical miles, which we keep hearing about, and what will be agreed internationally beyond 200 nautical miles.