The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2218 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
Graham, can I come in here? I read the briefing papers in the past few days, and this is all new to me. I get what you are saying about the major adaptations that would have to be made to storage and so on. Could liquid hydrogen be used for short haul, say Aberdeen to Dublin or Glasgow to London? Could there be fleets that service that market? Is that worth pursuing?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful, because my next question was going to be about battery electric for planes. Hold on to that thought, because I want to know whether the other witnesses have any views on liquid hydrogen. All that I can go on is the notes that I made in preparation for the meeting, which say that, by 2027, we are looking at 80-seater planes using liquid hydrogen for short haul. The question is whether, if technological advances go further, that is worth pursuing. I have no view on it. The committee wants to ensure that every aspect of technological advancement to pursue net zero for aviation is being explored. Liquid hydrogen is one of those technologies, so I want to tease that out. Are there any other views on liquid hydrogen? If not, perhaps you could comment on the use of battery electric for planes. Sebastian? Hold that thought, because Mark Morrison is taking up the cudgels.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
Before I move on to Mark Morrison, do you want to say anything about battery electric aircraft, Dr Eastham? I think that it said in our papers that Norway is hoping to move by 2030 to all short-haul and some medium-haul flights being battery electric, with the new fleets for those flights being almost exclusively battery electric.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
It is almost as though you knew that I was going to mention hydrogen and did a link for me, convener.
I know that we have spoken about hydrogen, and Graham Hutchings in particular talked about some drawbacks of using liquid hydrogen in flights. We spoke a bit more about using it as a power source to produce SAF, but there are opportunities for using liquid hydrogen directly as an aviation fuel, not as SAF, because it is not a drop-in fuel. Does it have the potential to lower emissions and be part of the mix in making aviation carbon neutral? Given that I have taken Graham Hutchings’s name in vain, perhaps we should go to him first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
Mercedes, I will bring you in, but because of time constraints, I will ask you an additional question. You can answer this final one or you can reflect on the two that I have already asked—that is up to you.
I have a wee note that says that there have been really good improvements in fuel efficiency over a number of years. Have we squeezed that as far as we can, or can we make more improvements?
That particular question does not have to be for you, Mercedes. I have asked three questions now; do you have reflections on any of them? If any of the other witnesses want to come back in on any of those, I would also be delighted to hear from them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
That is very helpful. Do any other witnesses have final reflections on the questions that I have asked?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Bob Doris
Okay. Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 September 2025
Bob Doris
I will start by asking you about the language used around social security spend. Depending on who is talking, it is an “overspend”, a “black hole”, an “investment” or “planned expenditure” by the Scottish Government and Social Security Scotland. That language is quite important. Do you consider there to be an overspend in the social security budget or do you believe that it is planned expenditure beyond what would have been spent anyway had we just followed Westminster’s policy agenda? Given that the language is quite important when we talk about our budgets, could you comment on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 September 2025
Bob Doris
We are hearing that it is about getting the balance right.
I mentioned that we spend nearly half a billion pounds on the Scottish child payment and £649 million to mitigate Westminster decisions. That is cash in the system at play. Given that this is pre-budget scrutiny, have any of the parties in the Scottish Parliament suggested that we should divert the half a billion pounds, or a portion of it, from the Scottish child payment, or that we should divert the £649 million, or a portion of it, to other endeavours rather than make the planned investment that the Scottish Government has currently outlined for those funds?