Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 27 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2049 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

MV Glen Sannox (Hull 801) and MV Glen Rosa (Hull 802)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

Yes. I will leave it at that.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

I will follow up on some of the matters that Mark Ruskell was pursuing, including the narrow list of individual bodies that could make a complaint in relation to a breach under a land management plan. A possible expanded role for the land and communities commissioner, which is to be quite limited at present, was mentioned.

I will split my question into two parts. I want to think about a proactive role that the land and communities commissioner could have in an area of prevention. Would work to encourage best practice in the development of land management plans be something that the commissioner would be well placed to support, perhaps by identifying and sharing best practice where it becomes evident, and by identifying thematic areas of weaknesses in plans? As the bill stands, I am not sure that the land and communities commissioner would be empowered to do that. Would that be a positive thing?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

It is worth putting on the record that I think that all committee members want to see a commissioner who works in partnership with landowners across the country and whose first approach will be not to identify breaches and look at sanctions but to build up the relationship. However, it may be beneficial for them to have that explicit power.

My final question is about whether the obligation on landowners is simply to produce a land management plan, irrespective of its quality or whether it is complied with in a meaningful way. We have heard reference to that already. For clarity, proposed new section 44B(3)(c) of the 2016 act requires the land management plan to set out how

“the owner is complying or intends to comply with ... the obligations set out in the regulations”,

and proposed new section 44E allows specific persons to allege that there has been a

“breach of an obligation imposed by regulations under section 44A”.

The fact that I am asking this question might lead to the conclusion. Is the drafting adequately clear to ensure that there are obligations to produce and to comply with a land management plan? If not, what suggestions do you have about how we can improve that section of the bill?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

MV Glen Sannox (Hull 801) and MV Glen Rosa (Hull 802)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

The reason for asking that is that we want all of you to turn Ferguson Marine around. We want you to win more orders and we want you to diversify. I am trying to get you to put on the record where Ferguson Marine is now, so that we can give confidence to people—not to the parliamentary committee that is scrutinising the matter, but to future investors and future partners, because we want you to win those contracts. Could the troubles that you have been through make you better prepared, and fitter and leaner in order to win contracts? How can you assure us that you are now getting it right?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

MV Glen Sannox (Hull 801) and MV Glen Rosa (Hull 802)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

As well as the structural need to modernise the yard, reputation and confidence have come up time and again as the biggest barriers. Clearly, the best way to rebuild reputation and confidence is to meet the new deadlines that have been set, within the cost envelopes that are forecast. Bluntly, that has been the challenge for years. On the basis that, given a fair wind, you nail this, what can others do—not Ferguson Marine—to help to rebuild reputation and confidence and to be a good friend to Ferguson Marine? We want the yard to be a success. The question is not about all the things that we know you need to do internally and that you have to be accountable for as an organisation. What can others do to assist?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

MV Glen Sannox (Hull 801) and MV Glen Rosa (Hull 802)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

Okay. That is clear. Mr Combe, will you comment?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

Okay. I appreciate that. Calum, will you comment?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Bob Doris

I have no further questions, convener. I stress that I do not anticipate that most landowners would produce such a plan, but when we legislate, we have to legislate for not only the best landowners but those who might be remiss in meeting their obligations in that regard. It is important to put that on the record.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Child Poverty (Scotland) Act 2017 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 21 November 2024

Bob Doris

I know that Peter Kelly wants to come in, but before he does that, I will be sneaky and ask a final question in this area. If I ask it now, our witnesses can respond to both questions and we can then move on to the next line of questioning.

Peter, if you have any reflections on Ms Smith’s question, it would be good to hear them, but I also have a question about the consequences of not implementing the act at a local level. I do not really like the word “consequences”, but is there a belief that the act is being implemented right across Scotland at a local level? If there is evidence that it is not, what should happen next? That is perhaps a better way of phrasing the question, but I know that you wanted to come in on the original question, too.