The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2458 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Frances?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you very much, Sarah. There was one more question that members had hoped to ask, which we kind of referred to when we were asking about value for money. I should ask it as it has been set out, and our witnesses can either respond to it or not.
Looking at the cost of establishing the commissioner’s office in the financial memorandum, I note that its running costs—not the cost of establishing it—are estimated at £1.26 million each year, and that the Welsh commissioner’s budget in the most recent financial year was £1.8 million. I just wanted to put that on the record and ask the witnesses whether they have any reflections on those costs. You do not have to have any, but that was the only question that we have not asked today.
This is slightly unusual, Sarah, but I am not asking you to answer that question—I just wanted to know whether you wanted to roll another question into that one. If so, you can do so, because I am conscious of the tradition of allowing the member in charge of the bill to ask their questions after all the other questions have been exhausted. It was just an error on our part that we had not asked that question.
I will leave my question sitting there. Is there any related question that you wanted to ask, Sarah?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Our next item of business is our second evidence session on the Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill at stage 1.
I welcome to the meeting Adam Milne, senior policy advocate, Carnegie UK; Frances Guy, chief executive officer, Scotland’s International Development Alliance; Kristers Lukins, member of the Scottish Youth Parliament for Dundee City West; Skye Allan, member of the Scottish Youth Parliament for Dumfriesshire; and Lloyd Austin, convener of the governance group at Scottish Environment LINK.
I also welcome to the meeting our two British Sign Language interpreters, Tessa and Mags. I thank them for joining us. That allows me to say to Kristers in BSL good morning, and welcome to the Scottish Parliament. I apologise for my poor signing. One point that I will take from this meeting is that I could perhaps learn a bit more about how to sign, which would be a good skill to have.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you. Would Kristers Lukins or Skye Allan like to add to the conversation about whether the bill could achieve policy coherence?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
I will pass on to Sarah Boyack in a moment. First, there is a question that we probably should have asked when Mr Milne was speaking earlier. I should give you this opportunity, Adam. You mentioned that Carnegie UK had outlined six possible operating models to deliver the ambitions around wellbeing and sustainable development, and the commissioner’s establishment and office was one of those models in the pursuit of those aims—so there would be five others. I am, of course, happy for you to refer us to written evidence, but do you wish to say anything for the Official Report in relation to those other potential models?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you, Adam. I just wanted to give you the opportunity to put some of that on the record.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Okay. Skye, you do not have to add anything, but do you wish to?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Your question was not quite the same as the one that I was going to ask, Mr Balfour, although it was similar.
You will all be aware of this, but the Children and Young People’s Commissioner was wary of establishing a new commissioner, due to potential overlap with that commissioner’s work and remit. I have lost my place in the briefing, but I think that the Scottish Environment Protection Agency mentioned other organisations such as Environmental Standards Scotland that could play a role without a commissioner having to be established. Given the possibility of overlap and other organisations being able to do this work, would spending money on a new commissioner be money well spent, or could it be better spent in other ways?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Lloyd Austin, do you have a view on this?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
In that case, I come to Skye Allan and then Kristers Lukins. This is your opportunity to put on record anything that our lines of questioning have not given you the opportunity to put on record this morning in relation to your work with MSYPs and other young people.
I will take you first, Skye.