The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2637 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Bob Doris
In Glasgow? Would the money go to colleges in Glasgow—full stop—rather than to colleges in general?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Bob Doris
And will those funds be recurring or will they be non-recurring funds?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Bob Doris
If such an opportunity arose, we should be looking for those funds to be recurring and embedded into the colleges’ core settlement instead of our having the whole question whether the money is recurring, non-recurring, transitional or embedded in the core settlement. I know that there was confusion between the Scottish Funding Council and the college principals with regard to what, exactly, that money could be used for.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Bob Doris
I am content to agree, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Bob Doris
That is helpful, minister. I have no further questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Bob Doris
Thanks, minister.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Bob Doris
The more I hear, the more the convener’s question about how that will be monitored becomes pertinent. In evidence sessions, witnesses have said that we do not want to set young people up to fail by putting in place an MRC that they will find really tough to comply with.
You mentioned that, should there be breaches of MRCs, there would be a review of the order that is in place and a fresh children’s panel would be held. If MRCs were used instead of a secure accommodation disposal by the children’s panels, that review would have to be done in short order. What reassurances can you give us, either today or by following up in writing, about how quickly children’s panels can be set up to carry out that review and to decide whether the MRC needs to be reviewed or kept in place, or whether the young person needs to be moved on to secure?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Bob Doris
That would be helpful, convener. I welcome the minister to her position.
The exchange with Ms Maguire was helpful, because I think that the committee has a better understanding of the policy intent behind the changes to the terminology relating to movement restriction conditions. The committee would welcome that being tightened up. We will produce a stage 1 report in due course. We have repeatedly heard about the challenges with the changes to MRCs and we have not heard much about the potential opportunities. I would not want those to get lost in our stage 1 report. Can you talk about what those opportunities might be?
I am assuming that an MRC is less restrictive than secure care, which may be better for a young person. For a young person who is in secure care, it is a big jump to have a full restoration of liberty. An MRC could be deployed as part of their pathway back into the community. I have not heard much about that.
Do you expect more MRCs to be used after the bill is passed? The convener is absolutely right to ask how that would be monitored. Will you also say what the potential benefits might be?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Bob Doris
I have a couple of brief questions, minister. The bill includes a number of provisions that seek to enhance the rights of children who have been detained in police custody with rights that they currently would not have. Could you expand on what those provisions are and how they will benefit young people in those situations?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Bob Doris
Thank you. I will not dwell on this aspect, as it is a pretty uncontentious part of the bill, but I note that the bill provides that young people will not be able to waive their right to legal representation, which is an additional protection.
At last week’s meeting, I nudged witnesses on the issue of whether young people should ever be detained in a police station. I am not saying that this is necessarily my view, but it has been suggested that a “place of safety” should never be a police station, unless that is—I am stumbling to say it—impractical. Do you think that there is a case for saying that it should be set out in the bill that no young person should ever be detained in a police station? If not, in what circumstances do you think that that would be unavoidable?