The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2218 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
That is very helpful. Whenever I hear the word “deer”, I look at the convener to see whether he has been triggered in any way. I see that that has not happened.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
Okay. Thank you. I see nodding heads in response to that comment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
No pressure then, convener.
The Scottish Government is clearly not required to follow all the advice of the Climate Change Committee, which is relaxed about that as long as there is a balanced pathway to net zero. One area in which there is variation is the policy on livestock numbers, because there is no policy to reduce livestock numbers in agriculture in Scotland. Livestock numbers are falling anyway—there is a longer-term pattern in relation to that. To what extent does the Scottish Government still rely on livestock numbers falling as part of its move to net zero?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
Okay.
I can infer from your previous comments what the answer is likely to be to this final question. The indicative statement differed from the advice of the Climate Change Committee on peatland restoration. Can you elaborate on that? Should we expect to see far greater savings, or lesser ones, from peatland restoration, and what are those assumptions based on?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful. Andrew Russell, your comment about the survival rates of new saplings was helpful, because my next question is around that. When the Scottish Government, or any Government, looks at abatement measures or sequestration measures, should modelling work on the abatement or sequestration that we capture say that, for every 100 saplings that are planted, there is an attrition rate of 5 per cent—given that there will be slippage because of the climate challenges that we face?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
I have mentioned peatland and forestry. Are there any other carbon-abatement measures that could be impacted by climate change that we should be aware of?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
This is my final question. Gabi Hegerl might be best placed to answer this one, given her initial answer. Is there a balance to be had between some of those measures and maintaining biodiversity? Gabi, you spoke about reforesting not having to be just about conifers but that there can be a mix of trees and that there can be multiple uses for spaces. My papers say that there might be concerns in relation to whether there is a trade-off between biodiversity and some of the opportunities for carbon abatement. Are there such concerns? Do you have any comments on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
This is my final, final question, convener. More generally, are there any risks to our ambitions for biodiversity from our pursuit of meeting carbon budgets that any of the witnesses would like to put on the record, just so that we can be clear about that?
I do not see anyone wanting to answer that, but it was suggested that that is something that we would want to clarify. If that is not the case, that is good.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
That is really helpful, and it leads on to my next couple of questions. The Climate Change Committee said, “Okay, the Scottish Government doesn’t want to see that trajectory in relation to livestock numbers, but there are other options out there that could be exercised to have a balanced pathway.” The CCC did not recommend any individual approach; instead, it has suggested a kind of pick-and-mix approach. For example, car kilometre reductions were modelled at 6 per cent, but the CCC advised that that could go up to 8 per cent, and it also mentioned scrappage schemes for cars and heating. There is a variety of other options that have not been triggered yet.
How would the Scottish Government seek to make up some of that? If we do not take action in one area—for very good reasons that you have set out on the record—what actions can be taken in another area to balance things out?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Bob Doris
That was helpful. My final question is about—