The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument makes amendments to the Education (Appeal Committee Procedures) (Scotland) Regulations 1982, which govern school admission and exclusion appeal hearings in Scotland. The committee asked a question about the enabling powers, specifically why section 28H(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 was not cited. The Scottish Government acknowledged that that section should have been cited as an enabling power, but considers that its omission does not affect the validity of the instrument.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground of a failure to follow proper drafting practice, in that section 28H(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 has not been cited as an enabling power in the preamble?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument??
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
I call Katy Clark.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
I have a more policy-related question for Mr Simpson. An act was passed in the UK Parliament and you have introduced this bill about MSPs. When you started working on it and were looking at it in its infancy, did you consider expanding the bill to include local authority councillors?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 19th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to please switch off or put to silent your mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is a decision on taking business in private. Is the committee content to take items 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to welcome that the instrument fulfils a commitment by the Scottish Government to correct a drafting error in the Valuation (Proposals Procedure) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2024 (SSI 2024/186)?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you. It would be helpful if you could also send the reply from the Electoral Commission to the committee.
I call Jeremy Balfour.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
It was something that struck me when I looked at the bill. I assume that it would not be feasible to include such a provision, because the bill is so tightly focused on parliamentarians. I do not imagine that any such amendments would be successful, but I thought I would take the opportunity to ask the question as you are sitting in front of us this morning.