The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2526 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to welcome the fact that the relaid draft order addresses issues that were reported by the session 5 committee at its meeting on 12 January 2021 in respect of the draft Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Short-term Lets) Order 2021?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the regulations?
Members indicated agreement.
11:34 Meeting continued in private until 11:51.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
The regulations were laid yesterday and amend the Covid certification scheme so that it will be possible to access venues or events that are covered by the scheme by showing either proof of vaccination or exemption from the scheme—as happens now—or a recent negative test result. The Scottish Government considers it necessary to implement the change from next Monday, which is 6 December.
The Government has chosen to use the affirmative procedure rather than the made affirmative procedure on this occasion. However, the timescale does not allow for the normal scrutiny timescale for affirmative instruments. Although the committee has in the past called for the affirmative procedure to be used instead of the made affirmative procedure, that should not be at the cost of proper parliamentary scrutiny. I am minded to agree to the timetable that the Scottish Government has set out on this occasion, but I am clear that that does not set a precedent for future regulations.
Although, in the very limited time available, no points have been raised on the instrument, I reserve the committee’s right to look at it again next week, should any issues subsequently be found. We could then write to the Scottish Government to highlight anything that may emerge as a consequence.
Do colleagues have any comments on the instrument?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering instruments subject to the negative procedure. No points have been raised on the following Scottish statutory instruments.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
Also, does the committee wish to welcome the fact that SSI 2021/424 rectifies errors in the Public Procurement (Agreement on Government Procurement) (Thresholds etc) (Amendment) (Scotland) Regulations 2021 that were highlighted by the committee at its meeting on 16 November?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
Under the final agenda item, we are considering an instrument that is not subject to parliamentary procedure and on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
The committee’s next meeting will take place on Tuesday 7 December.
Meeting closed at 10:26.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
Good morning, and welcome to the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee’s 12th meeting in session 6. Before we move to the first item on the agenda, I remind everyone present to switch mobile phones to silent.
The first item of business is consideration of the following instrument, which is subject to the affirmative procedure.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Stuart McMillan
Thank you, colleagues.
There are a couple of points. First, on the drafting of the instrument, as has been discussed, it is not considered to be technically deficient—that is the advice that we have received from our legal team. Taking that into account, is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.