The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2261 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
Does anyone have any questions on the instrument?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
We come to agenda item 3. No points have been raised on the following orders.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
We come to agenda item 4. Issues have been raised on four of the instruments under consideration.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
There also appears to be an unusual or unexpected use of the enabling powers that are conferred by the parent statute. It would be more usual and expected for the Parliament to be given the opportunity to scrutinise the code of practice where there is a requirement in law to comply with it.
Does the committee wish to bring the regulations to the Parliament’s attention on reporting ground (g), on the basis that they have been made by the Scottish ministers with what appears to be an unusual and unexpected use of the enabling power?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
The second negative instrument on which an issue has been raised is SSI 2021/241. The amendment regulations amend the original regulations and provide for free dental treatment for all young people aged between 18 and 25. They were laid on 15 June 2021 and came into force on 24 August. As the Parliament was in recess from 26 June until 29 August, during which time the clock stopped, the regulations were laid less than 28 days before they came into force. They are therefore in breach of section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, which requires that negative instruments are laid at least 28 days before they come into force, not counting recess periods of more than four days.
Do members have any comments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
The suggestion is to write to the lead committee, and I think we should do that in relation to the points raised by Graham Simpson and Craig Hoy. I think it would also be worth writing to the lead committee on the points raised by Paul Sweeney regarding licensing, so that the lead committee can take that up. There could be policy matters that are important for licensing legislation. Are you content with that, Paul?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
We come to agenda item 2. An issue has been raised concerning SSI 2021/277, which revokes the Health Protection (Coronavirus) (Restrictions and Requirements) (Local Levels) (Scotland) Regulations 2020 (SSI 2020/344) but retains some requirements that are still considered necessary by the Scottish Government and provides that those are applied uniformly across Scotland.
The instrument requires that, subject to some exemptions, face coverings should still be worn in most indoor spaces. The guidance accompanying the instrument states that face coverings are not required to be worn while dancing in a nightclub or dance hall. However, a specific exemption for dancing is not listed in the instrument. In correspondence, the Scottish Government said:
“It is considered that dancing is a form of exercise which reasonably requires that the person is not wearing a face covering”,
which is an exemption provided for by regulation 5(1)(r).
Does the committee wish to bring the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (h), which is that its meaning or form could be clearer?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
10:27 Meeting continued in private until 10:43.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
The regulations make provision for the establishment and maintenance of a register of child interview rights practitioners to provide children with advice, support and assistance in relation to their involvement in investigative interviews. Regulation 3(6)(a) provides that
“A person who is included in the register must comply with ... the Code of Practice”
for child interview rights practitioners that has been published by the Scottish Government. However, regulation 3(7), when compared against the mandatory requirements contained in paragraph 17 of the code of practice, appears to provide differing notification timescales and requirements for child interview rights practitioners—yet both must be complied with.
In light of that, does the committee wish to bring the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (h), on the basis that its meaning or form could be clearer, while also calling on the Scottish Government to clarify that issue as soon as possible?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 31 August 2021
Stuart McMillan
On the point about the change of minister, it is clear that the officials would remain the same, unless there was also a change there. You raise a valid point, Graham.
Does the committee wish to draw the regulations to the Parliament’s attention on reporting ground (j), as they were laid less than 28 days before they came into force?
Members indicated agreement.