The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2261 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
An issue has been raised on SSI 2021/301. Regulation 4(b) inserts a new paragraph 9 into regulation 5F of the Health Protection (Coronavirus) (International Travel) (Scotland) Regulations 2020. New paragraph 9 provides for the definition of “private provider” in respect of Covid-19 day 2 and day 8 test providers. As currently drafted, new paragraph 9(b) refers to
“private day 2 and day 2 test providers”,
which should be “private day 2 and day 8 test providers”.
The Scottish Government advised that that would be rectified in a forthcoming amending instrument. SSI 2021/307 was laid before the Parliament on Friday 10 September and includes provision rectifying the error. That instrument will be considered by the committee in due course.
Are members content to report SSI 2021/301 under the general reporting ground due to a typographical error in regulation 4(b), while also noting that the Scottish Government has rectified the error?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
No points have been raised on the instrument. Is the committee content with it?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
No points have been raised on the instrument. Is the committee content with it?
Members indicated agreement.
10:26 Meeting continued in private until 10:43.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Oh, sorry. Go ahead, Mr Simpson.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee in session 6. Before we move to the first item on the agenda, I remind everyone to switch their mobile phones to silent.
The first item of business is to decide whether to take items 6 and 7 in private. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
The next item of business is consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument subject to the made affirmative procedure. No points have been raised on the instrument. Is the committee content with it?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Under the next agenda item, we are considering instruments subject to the affirmative procedure. No points have been raised on the following draft instruments.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
With that, I will move the meeting into private—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
We would all agree that we live in different times compared to the normal political times that we had pre Covid. In the debate on Thursday, policy matters will certainly be highlighted. Your suggestion that we write to the Government to ask about the process is worth while. With the committee’s approval, I am content for that to happen and for us to get that explanation. Mr Simpson’s point about writing to the relevant committee is also worth while. Do members agree to those suggestions?
Members indicated agreement.