The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2046 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Stuart McMillan
An issue has been raised on Scottish statutory instrument 2021/322. The?instrument revokes three previous sets of regulations and replaces them with consolidated international travel regulations, with the aim of improving their readability and accessibility, as well as making certain specific changes.
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the committee highlighted that schedule 4 to the instrument provides exemptions from requirements in the international travel regulations for certain people, including a “member of aircraft crew” as defined in subparagraph 10(2)(a)(ii).
The term “EU-OPS” is used in that paragraph, and it is defined in subparagraph 10(2)(c) with reference to the meaning of that term in paragraph 1 of schedule 1 to the Air Navigation Order 2016. However, there is no reference to EU-OPS in that order. The Scottish Government has confirmed that that is an error, in so far as there is no longer such a reference in the order, and it undertook to correct the error at the next available opportunity.
Are members content to report the instrument on reporting ground (h), on the basis that the instrument’s meaning could be clearer in that respect, and to welcome the Scottish Government’s commitment to clarify the position by updating the reference at the next available opportunity, which it has done in SSI 2021/343?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 3 is consideration of two affirmative instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
The instrument brings into force section 17 of, and schedule 1 to, the Local Electoral Administration and Registration Services (Scotland) Act 2006. It forms part of a package of Scottish statutory instruments relating to elections that were laid before the Parliament earlier this month.
In correspondence, the committee asked the Scottish Government why section 17 and schedule 1 are only now being commenced, 15 years after the 2006 act was passed. The Scottish Government replied to say that there was an apparent omission in section 17 of the 2006 act at the time that it was enacted, in so far as it did not commence the accounting period for election expenses when an individual becomes a candidate.
That is being corrected by article 3(4) of the Scottish Local Government Elections Amendment Order 2021, which the committee considered last week. That in turn enables section 17 of the 2006 act to be brought into force by the current instrument. A copy of the Scottish Government’s full response can be read in paper 3 for the meeting, which is available on the committee’s website.
The response also indicates that steps to rectify the omission were not given priority, despite there having been various local government elections since 2006. Given the omission and the delay in resolving it, are members content to report the instrument under reporting ground (g), on the basis that it has been made by what appears to be an unusual or unexpected use of the commencement powers conferred by the parent statute?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Also, does the committee wish to highlight to the lead committee the Scottish Government’s response as to why the delay in rectifying the omission occurred, so that that committee might consider whether the explanation is satisfactory from a policy perspective?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
No points have been raised on the following instruments.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 4, no points have been raised on the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 6, an issue has been raised on the following instrument.