The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2046 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
I thank Morag Ross QC and Dr Ruth Fox very much for their helpful evidence. The committee extends its appreciation to you both. If the committee has any additional questions, we will write to you.
11:26 Meeting suspended.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
We move to questions from Paul Sweeney.
Your microphone is on mute, Paul.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the regulations?
Members indicated agreement.
11:34 Meeting continued in private until 11:51.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Under item 3, we will consider an instrument that has been laid under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. The committee is considering whether the appropriate scrutiny procedure and the appropriate category have been applied to the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
The instrument was laid under the negative procedure and the Scottish Government considers it to be of low significance. Is the committee content that the appropriate scrutiny procedure has been applied?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Finally, does the committee wish to welcome the fact that the Scottish Government laid the instrument timeously to rectify an error that was identified by the committee at its meeting on 23 November?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Also under this item are three more negative instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Item 7 is consideration of an instrument not subject to parliamentary procedure and on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the explanation provided by the Scottish Government for breach of the requirement in section 28(2) of the 2010 act?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Item 2 is an evidence session for the committee’s inquiry into use of the made affirmative procedure during the coronavirus pandemic. This is the first of two evidence sessions that are planned for this month, before the committee takes evidence from the Scottish Government in January.
I welcome to the meeting Dr Ruth Fox from the Hansard Society, who is appearing remotely from London, and Morag Ross QC from the Faculty of Advocates, who is joining us in the committee room. We are very grateful that both of you are able to attend the meeting.
I will start the questioning. I would be grateful to get an understanding of your general views on the made affirmative procedure. For example, what are your observations on the frequency of use of the procedure during the coronavirus pandemic compared with its use pre-pandemic?