The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2053 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
We have lost sound again, Professor Tierney.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Colleagues have made a number of points there, for which I thank them.
First, does the committee wish to report that it is not content with the explanation that the Scottish Government has provided for a breach of the requirement in section 28(2) of the 2010 act? As the committee has done previously, I emphasise that the Scottish Government should normally comply with laying requirements to facilitate timely parliamentary scrutiny of such important policy choices.
Secondly, does the committee agree to highlight to the lead committee the correspondence that has been received from the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research?
Finally, does the committee wish to highlight concerns about the speed of change in policy to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans, who is responsible for prison reform and policy, and to the Minister for Drugs Policy?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the regulations?
No member has indicated that they are not content or that they wish to speak, so we are agreed.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
An issue has been raised on the draft regulations, which are made as part of a wider legislative framework for the administration of social security assistance in Scotland provided for by the Social Security (Scotland) Act 2018. Section 97(9) of that act includes a requirement on Scottish ministers at the time of laying the instrument to lay a response to the Scottish Commission on Social Security’s report on the proposals for the regulations or a statement explaining why ministers consider it appropriate to lay the draft instrument before the commission has submitted its report on the proposals for the regulations.
One set of amendments in this instrument was not reported on by the commission prior to the instrument being laid. A statement under section 97(9)(b) of the 2018 act was sent to the Social Justice and Social Security Committee on 1 December but the statement was not laid until 3 December. In a written response to a question from the committee, which can be found in the public papers for this meeting, the Scottish Government has apologised for that administrative oversight.
Does the committee agree to report the instrument on the general reporting ground in respect of a failure to lay the necessary statement when laying the draft instrument on 29 November 2021 as required under section 97(9)(b) of the 2018 act?
Although the committee might wish to welcome the Scottish Government’s apology for the administrative oversight and to acknowledge that it related only to one set of minor technical amendments and was corrected within four days, it was still a clear breach of the laying requirements. Does the committee also wish to write to the Minister for Parliamentary Business, highlighting its desire for all instruments to be laid correctly?
No member has indicated that they are not content or that they wish to speak, so we are agreed.
Also under this agenda item is another set of draft regulations, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
I will comment on one thing before I hand over to Graham Simpson. Last week, Dr Fox indicated to the committee that this type of debate has been going on since the early 1930s. It is obviously not a new debate, and it is clear that nobody has managed to reach a successful outcome since that time. I would imagine that, even if a successful outcome had been found at some point in the past or were to be found, different events will happen and different solutions will be required for them, too.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
I will come back on that point, Sir Jonathan. There are three devolved Parliaments in the UK as well as the UK Parliament. I do not have a specific example, but if the UK Government brought in a made affirmative instrument to change travel restrictions to make things harder or easier, but the devolved Administrations decided not to and to keep separate arrangements, I am sure that there would be political discourse challenging the devolved Administrations on why they were not following suit and keeping the arrangements as tightly drawn as possible to enable a four-nations approach on the issue. Do you agree?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
We have lost your sound, Professor Tierney.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
We are about to close but, before we do so, I ask the witnesses whether they have any additional comments or points that they would like to highlight that they feel have not been covered.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
The final point that I raised was about writing to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans, and we will certainly incorporate members’ thoughts.
Is the committee content with those actions?
No member has indicated that they are not content or that they wish to speak, so we are agreed.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Stuart McMillan
Item 6 is consideration of instruments that are not subject to parliamentary procedure and on which no points have been raised.