The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2280 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
Under item 3, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
On 23 May, Madelaine Sproule of the Church of Scotland Trust and Joan Fraser, a trustee of various trusts, appeared before the committee. Madelaine Sproule said:
“the crossover between the legislation that affects charitable trusts and the legislation that affects charities and other trusts is not entirely clear. I think that that could be specified better in the bill.”—[Official Report, Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, 23 May 2023; c 28.]
In correspondence, the Scottish Law Commission expressed the view that section 70A of the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005, as amended by section 8 of the charities bill, if that bill is passed by Parliament, was a particular statutory power that would take priority over the general default power of the court in section 1 of the trusts bill. It went on to suggest that nowhere in the trusts bill is that explicitly stated.
To go back to Jeremy Balfour’s questions, it would be worth considering those points, and it would be good if you could write to the committee on them.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
I will open the questions, the first of which is on section 104 orders. We faced a similar situation with the Moveable Transactions (Scotland) Bill. Will you provide the committee with an update on how discussions are progressing between the Scottish and UK Governments on a possible section 104 order with regard to the application of the bill’s provisions to pension scheme trusts?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
Thank you. I am sorry, Jeremy.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
If the Government will not consider carrying out a media campaign, will it consider writing to each trust after the legislation is passed, to make them aware that new legislation is in place, and to provide helpful links in any correspondence so that trustees can then look at those themselves?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
Jeremy Balfour has a question about that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
We move on to the issue of what happens when someone dies without leaving a will. Currently, a cohabitant has six months to apply to the court in order to access the deceased person’s estate. We have heard a lot of evidence on the strict six-month time limit. It is fair to say that the majority feel that that time period is far too short. Various witnesses have suggested that the bill should be amended to address the issue, and there have been several suggestions about the specific nature of any changes. Having heard the views that have been expressed in evidence, is the minister persuaded that the bill should be amended to change the six-month time limit, or are there drawbacks to a change in policy?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
Thank you, minister. The Faculty of Advocates argued that a power for the court to extend the time limit on an individual case-by-case basis should have been included in the bill; indeed, it did not think that that particular aspect would be controversial. It also suggested that it would help grieving and vulnerable cohabitants navigate family dynamics after the death. I should add that Yvonne Evans suggested that the time limit simply be extended to 12 months, and others thought that that should be the case, too.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Stuart McMillan
Just before I bring in Jeremy Balfour, I want to pick up the point about grief. Obviously, grief affects everyone differently, so the six-month time period might be far too short for some individuals. Therefore, the recommendation from the Faculty of Advocates on extending the period on an individual case-by-case basis could be a compromise in the bill. That said, there was strong evidence in support of a full extension to 12 months.