The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 620 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I will be, convener. My question picks up on Sharon Dowey’s points but more specifically on the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s comment to us, Ms Gosal, that your assumption in the financial memorandum—that each caseworker who deals with MAPPA notification requirements has a case allocation of between 50 and 60—is not correct. It says that, according to COSLA, that
“is in ‘direct conflict with the Social Work Scotland Setting the Bar report, which advised that 20-25 cases per worker was manageable and safe’”
and that
“East Renfrewshire Health and Social Care Partnership, South Lanarkshire Council, and Police Scotland agreed with COSLA’s view that the FM sets an unrealistic caseload target.”
You have just said that you do not think that there will be any changes to your estimate, but how do you respond to what the committee has said?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
So it could be quite a bit higher—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
You said again that we have had only two evidence sessions on the bill. I have taken a bill through the Parliament with the full support of the Government and I recognise the work that goes into that, so I understand the work that will have gone into taking your member’s bill forward. You said that you set out to do so three and a half years ago. The cut-off point for introducing a member’s bill was in June last year, and you introduced yours in May. Do you accept that the point at which you introduced the bill will inevitably have limited the amount of time that we have to look at it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am aware of that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I appreciate your position, but I am asking whether you think that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Police Scotland are wrong.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am asking what you would say in response if they raised the same issue about any other bill.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Returning to UNCRC compliance, I did not, to be frank, think that this would be raised as an issue in evidence, but the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office flagged it almost as an aside.
Indeed, I was struck by what was said when I asked about the matter in our evidence session with the COPFS and the Law Society of Scotland. You have said that you are clear that the bill has no UNCRC compliance issues, but I will quote from the Official Report of a previous meeting. When I asked Dr Forbes from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service whether she had
“the sense that not enough thought has been given to the issue of compliance with the UNCRC at this stage”,
she replied:
“I did not see it addressed in the policy memorandum, I have to say.”
When I further asked Dr Forbes whether she felt that not enough due consideration had been given to the issue and whether there was
“a possibility that the bill as drafted might fall foul of our legislation with regard to compliance with the UNCRC”. —[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 10 December 2025; c 23.],
she gave a preamble but, effectively, her answer to the question was yes. Why is the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service wrong and you are right?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I do not think that Scottish Women’s Aid was necessarily saying that it would apply to their organisation specifically. It was talking about the burden that the bureaucracy would place on Police Scotland, and so on.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Well, let us suppose that you were. Where should it come from?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Okay.