The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 430 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Good morning. Thank you for your evidence so far.
I will start with a question that is perhaps a little more unfair on panel 1 than on panel 2. With your permission, convener, I will go on to ask panel 2 the same question, so those witnesses will have the benefit of having heard the previous responses, whereas the current witnesses have not had that benefit.
Do you perceive that there is common ground on any element of the bill proposal with people who oppose the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I appreciate that. You have all spoken about the concern, which I think we all share, about ensuring that the safety of those who are involved in prostitution—who, clearly and overwhelmingly, are women, primarily—is paramount. That is imperative. I was taken with the point that you made, Amanda Jane, that no system can make prostitution safe. The question that we are grappling with in this context is whether changes under the bill would make it less safe or more safe for those who are involved.
I am happy to hear general observations. However, as well as your helpful written evidence, for which I am very grateful, we have had a variety of evidence submitted by people who are opposed to the bill. Information has been provided that suggests that, in other jurisdictions, changes that have been made that are similar to the proposals in the bill have made the experience of those involved in prostitution less safe.
Ugly Mugs Ireland has found evidence showing that the number of crimes against sex workers—that is the terminology that the organisation uses, I should say—almost doubled in the two years following the introduction of the law in the Republic of Ireland. HIV Ireland has found that, under the Nordic model, sex workers who experience violence at work are increasingly reluctant to report to the police. The Northern Ireland Department of Justice, in a 2019 review, reported that
“assaults against sex workers ... increased by 225% from 2016 to 2018.”
Médecins du Monde has reported that the law in France has led to 42 per cent of workers being exposed to more violence and 38 per cent finding it increasingly hard to demand condom use.
On the face of it, those are concerning figures, obviously. What is your response, on hearing that evidence?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Perhaps we will need to look into that a bit more.
I have one final question, convener. I could ask a lot of questions, but I recognise that all members will be in the same boat.
I bring us back to the provisions of the bill, which talks about a duty to provide assistance and support to people who are looking to exit prostitution. What might that support look like, and could it be provided on a non-statutory basis?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Yes, thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Your point is more about the consequences, which you think would run contrary to people’s human rights, rather than about the provisions of the bill per se.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That is helpful to understand. Clearly, we will have the opportunity to ask questions about that, just as I am asking questions about the poll that Lynsey Walton’s evidence cites.
I have one final question, because it is important to ask the same question of panel 2 as I did of panel 1. It goes back to the duty to provide assistance and support to those seeking to leave prostitution and sex work. I think that all the people on the panel have said that they support that provision. What would that support look like? Could it be provided on a non-statutory basis?
11:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I do not know whether Amanda Jane or Diane might have anything to add to that. It is okay if you do not.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
When speaking with the previous panel, I promised to put my question about common ground to the second panel. Those whom we heard from on panel 1 are in favour of the bill and you oppose it. Do you perceive there to be any common ground between you?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That would be helpful.
I have another question—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Not at all.