The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 748 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
What the hell are we feeding them?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Again, it is useful to understand that. Craig, can you very quickly explain to us the equivalent powers? When you make recommendations to Police Scotland, is it obliged to implement them?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I have one final area for Craig Naylor that picks up on something that we will be discussing later, which is the Police Service of Scotland (Vetting) Regulations 2026. You have been very clear in your letter that you support them. I do not think it would be equitable to invite you to set out why you support them, because no one else has that opportunity. My question relates more to your inspection function and to understanding whether that would be an area that you would be empowered to look at, not on an individual, case-by-case basis, but with regard to the number of people who might be dismissed or suspended, the number of officers who are demoted and the number of instances where the assessor has overturned whatever the decision might be. Will you be able to look at that and report on it? If a pattern emerges, will you make recommendations around it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I agree that the additional information has been useful. I am inclined to agree with Pauline McNeill that, just because a set of circumstances exists in other parts of the UK, that is not on its own reason enough to replicate that here. However, there are good reasons to have the ability to have intermittent vetting processes for police officers, given the powers that they hold.
The answer that Craig Naylor gave to the question that I asked gives me further reassurance. However, I have always been reassured that an assessor is involved and that an independent process will be carried out to look at the issue. On balance, I remain satisfied with the instrument.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Should it be?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I have a couple of areas that I want to explore. This was not one of them, but I am going to follow up on something that you just said, Mr Naylor. What figure did you provide for holding a seized dog?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
That is what I thought you said. Is that per dog?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am sorry, but I do not think that that figure is plausible. We might need to explore it separately.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I might have picked this up incorrectly, so forgive me. I think that Sharon Dowey pursued the line of sight for the wider public with you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Did you say that you do not publish that information and that it is not made publicly available?