The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 724 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
In this area, the focus understandably tends to be on the capacity of the health service to accommodate those who are brought into the hospital environment. We understand that that is a significant issue; it might be the primary issue. I was taken with evidence that the committee gathered at the meeting that we held on 18 February, when we heard from Dr Robby Steel, a consultant psychiatrist who works with NHS Scotland. He is involved with Police Scotland to try to improve things. I was taken with his point that, presumably, the police officers who bring someone to a hospital environment think that it is the right place and a safe place for the person to be, but that it is his experience that, sometimes, he says to officers, “You’ve brought the person here. You can go now” and they say that they cannot go and that that is at the instruction of a superior officer. I pressed that point with David Threadgold, and he said that that is sometimes his experience, too.
ACC Paton said that work is being done to build confidence among officers to recognise when they can leave someone at the hospital, but do you recognise that as a challenge? Even if that is marginal, there would presumably be a cost benefit—we are talking about the budget today—to saying that officers can leave once they have taken someone to the hospital.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I have just a couple of questions. First, going back to the capital budget allocation, I note that you got around 92 per cent of the amount that you were seeking, which I think was around 23 per cent up from the autumn budget revision position. Clearly, though, you did not get everything that you were seeking.
You have touched a little on the issue of prioritisation, but I just want to go back to the estate and digital data requirements. I appreciate that body-worn cameras, which have been mentioned, are very specific things that only Police Scotland can carry, but in previous evidence sessions, with a range of bodies, we touched on the potential for greater collaboration, particularly in the digital area, but perhaps in the estate, too. I am keen to understand whether that is being actively looked at. For example, if we are talking about the sharing of data between, say, the Crown Office and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, I know that they have a shared campus in Livingston. Are those sorts of cost benefit opportunities still being actively explored?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It would be useful if we could get that. I think that you told us at the last meeting that it equated to about 500 officers’ salaries.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
You mentioned the two new prisons that are being constructed. Are you able to confirm that those are still on schedule?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I think that you said that that will provide 460 additional spaces.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I will not give the precise figures but, basically, from 2022-23 to 2023-24, the numbers being sentenced were up, which goes against the grain of there being a presumption against short-term sentences. Do you have any insight or understanding into what is driving that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Broadly speaking, I am pretty satisfied with the instrument. The policy note probably explains enough of the context. If colleagues want more information, we can look at it next week, but I am fairly convinced that we will be persuaded.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Is that a methodology that you have devised yourself, or is it prescribed?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Presumably, though, some complaints that might be found to be vexatious might not even reach the threshold of saying that it constitutes a matter worth investigating and that the person who has made the report requires that level of sanction. There must be some that you can look at and pretty quickly see whether there is a sufficiency of evidence.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Those are obviously cases that would require investigation. I am thinking more of ones that were referred to earlier, such as someone saying that an officer was rude to them when they went into the station to make a complaint. How is that type of thing looked into? Are you able to determine that there was a case—“case” with a lower-case C rather than an upper-case C—to answer?