The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 620 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Dr Forbes said that she could not see compliance with the UNCRC being addressed in the policy memorandum. Why did she say that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
There might be a statement, but she is saying that there might not be enough detail. I have not looked, but I know that there will be a statement saying that you consider the bill to be compliant. What work has been done to demonstrate that the matter was given due consideration?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I understand all of that. I have been an elected member of the Parliament for 18 and a half years. I understand all the processes, but member’s bills have been introduced sooner. I will leave that there. My fundamental point is that there was a suggestion of concern about the process that we have gone through but, at the end of the day, the bill was introduced in May and there is limited time for us to take evidence.
I will ask a more specific question on part 1. You mentioned a £7 billion cost to society over a three-year period. Notwithstanding that cost, we obviously want to reduce the impact on women and children. That is the fundamental thing that we want to do, but we also want to bring down that cost. Presumably, part of the intention of the bill is to deter such behaviour in the first place—to bring down such incidents and such behaviour. Is that correct? Is the intention for it to have some deterrent effect?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
That is fine, but you have no information on the others, because you have not engaged with them on it.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
If the bill requires amendment, do you agree that there is the possibility that, as drafted, it could retraumatise victims?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Well, now that we have this available from the Finance and Public Administration Committee, what is your response to it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Do you accept that the figures that are presented in the financial memorandum might be different?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
My questions relate to part 1, but I have an initial question that is based on Ms Gosal’s opening remarks. It is important because it relates to the process that we are going through.
I might be paraphrasing, but you suggested that the full range of views could not be properly heard over the course of what you described as just two evidence sessions. Is there an inherent suggestion that the process that the committee has gone through has been deficient? Should we have taken longer to consider the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Okay.