The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 724 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It is reassuring to know that it has been done, because that has not always been clear when trying to explore that aspect. If we can have some line of sight on that, that would be really helpful.
I have two more very quick questions. One picks up on Pauline McNeill’s point about retained firefighters. As a service, you have recognised the difficulties in recruiting retained firefighters, and the FBU has made that point as well. A lot of these changes are, as you have set out, predicated on the recruitment of additional retained firefighters. Supposing that that is not possible or successful, is there any guarantee—again, I recognise that it might be on a localised basis—that changes that are predicated on that recruitment would not go ahead because you had not been able to recruit?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It is useful to understand that.
I have one other question. I indicated to the FBU that I would ask it, so I should. Again, the FBU does not think that it is sleight of hand or anything, but it said that it would have been helpful to understand in more detail the scoring exercise for the options that were presented at an event at Stirling. Is it possible to get a greater line of sight on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I might need to try to understand why we were told that the scoring was not available, although I might have misunderstood the point.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
The previous panel members said the same, and I am not suggesting otherwise. The chief officer is saying that the scoring is available, so we should be able to see that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I will be, convener. My question picks up on Sharon Dowey’s points but more specifically on the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s comment to us, Ms Gosal, that your assumption in the financial memorandum—that each caseworker who deals with MAPPA notification requirements has a case allocation of between 50 and 60—is not correct. It says that, according to COSLA, that
“is in ‘direct conflict with the Social Work Scotland Setting the Bar report, which advised that 20-25 cases per worker was manageable and safe’”
and that
“East Renfrewshire Health and Social Care Partnership, South Lanarkshire Council, and Police Scotland agreed with COSLA’s view that the FM sets an unrealistic caseload target.”
You have just said that you do not think that there will be any changes to your estimate, but how do you respond to what the committee has said?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
So it could be quite a bit higher—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
You said again that we have had only two evidence sessions on the bill. I have taken a bill through the Parliament with the full support of the Government and I recognise the work that goes into that, so I understand the work that will have gone into taking your member’s bill forward. You said that you set out to do so three and a half years ago. The cut-off point for introducing a member’s bill was in June last year, and you introduced yours in May. Do you accept that the point at which you introduced the bill will inevitably have limited the amount of time that we have to look at it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am aware of that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I appreciate your position, but I am asking whether you think that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Police Scotland are wrong.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am asking what you would say in response if they raised the same issue about any other bill.