The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 576 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Part 2 relates to rehabilitation work, and part 4 is about education. What have local authorities been saying about the expectations on costs?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Indeed. What do the ones that are left say is the issue?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
My final question is about part 3 and data collection. You said that you recognise that more can be done in that regard but that you think that it can be achieved without legislation. You also talked about a concern about a significant burden—you used that specific term—being placed on charities, which are clearly not constituted to gather data. It is a different thing to ask courts, Police Scotland and the rest, who will gather data all the time. What leads you to conclude that it will be a significant burden? Have charities raised that as a concern when speaking with the Government?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I take that point. You said that there are a couple of other areas of the memorandum that you want to explore. In relation to part 2, on rehabilitation, you talk about the commitment to expanding the Caledonian system more widely across Scotland, and you set out some of the activity that is under way. Will you expand on that? I guess that the how and the when are the key points there. Can you set out the work that has been undertaken and say when the system is likely to be more widely available across Scotland? Ideally, it will be available across the entirety of the country—that must be the aim. Is that being worked towards, and when is that likely to happen?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
There will be seven local authorities left in which to roll out the Caledonian system. What is the impediment to its going further?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
So, next year we will have greater clarity on what the next steps will be.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Is there a concern that the bill could cut across that and divert activity away from what has been the purpose of the discussion thus far?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That means that significant progress will be made by the end of next year. Are you confident that we will be able to roll the system out across the country in due course?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I have a few questions on the back of the letter that the minister kindly sent to us yesterday. My first question relates to the Government’s assessment of the financial memorandum and the cost of the bill. You set out that there would be significant costs for local authorities, which have been estimated—I will not give the precise number—to be about £4.7 million under part 2 of the bill and about £4.8 million under part 4. The memorandum indicates that those costs are likely to be underestimates. What led you to that conclusion? Do you have a more realistic figure for the specific costs for local authorities, as well as for the cost of the bill as a whole?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Thank you.
I have one final question, which relates to education in schools. In its evidence, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service highlights the right given in the bill to withdraw pupils from domestic abuse education and suggests that there could be implications in respect of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. I found that an interesting observation. Can you say any more about it?