The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2792 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
What we are referring to here is the national picture as opposed to the ground-level approach. However, we do not know what those local institutions are doing around reaching out to care-experienced young people. Do we assume that it is happening, or do we have evidence that it is happening?
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one last question. Given the Auditor General’s comment that the Scottish Government lacks a clear framework to assess the overall impact of ADP, how might the recommendations of your review support the development of such an evaluation strategy?
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
That is very good to hear. The problem is that aspects of dignity, fairness and respect are very subjective and are difficult to measure. You get responses to your questionnaires and so on, and you do your assessments, but how do you evaluate that information in a way that helps Social Security Scotland to put in place positive changes in response?
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
The Auditor General highlighted that survey scores are positive overall, which seems to align with your consultation findings, but Audit Scotland also noted that it is not clear what levels the Scottish Government would regard as acceptable or whether it expects better satisfaction scores for PIP, given that the approach to ADP is different. Audit Scotland suggested that Social Security Scotland should consider setting such a level as part of its evaluation and include results around dignity, fairness and respect in the public performance indicators to measure success in that regard. Do you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on to another area that you will not be unfamiliar with: data collection. I do not know how many times this committee has talked about the lack of data and the anomalies within the data collection system.
Page 4 of the report says:
“Available data is not sufficient to assess if services are improving the lives of care-experienced people at a national level, but improvements are under way to enable long-standing data barriers to be addressed.”
The first question is, what are the data barriers that are being addressed? Given the fact that data collection has been in front of the committee for ever and has always been commented on, why is the Government not learning from previous deficiencies?
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
I sometimes despair of the terminology that is used in some of these reports. On page 27, you refer to “longitudinal research and data triage”. Could I have that in English, perhaps?
10:15Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I am keen to understand the relationship between the work of the local council and the body that is providing the funding, or a great part of the funding, which is the Government. There seems to be an element of isolation.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Given that you say that the average major project takes approximately five years and that, during that time, costs will probably escalate—as you say, you find things that you did not expect and so on, so the cost goes up—at what point during those five years do you get certainty that you will have enough funding for the scheme? That process in itself is not cost free, because there will be consultancies and other work going on, which cost money.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Could a better mechanism be put in place to manage cost escalation? That is obviously a big issue at the moment, but the fact is that, over any five-year period, you are going to get inflation built into materials and all the rest of it. Could that be better managed?
10:00Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I think that this is a question for Mr Brannen. Looking at the existing schemes and the schemes that are currently being considered as part of cycle 2, can you tell us when funding certainty will be in place for those projects?