The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3025 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Colin Beattie
In exhibit 1, you clearly detail how much in that particular calculation is for domestic transport. I am not sure where commercial vehicles and the like come into it—that is not quite clear. Will you comment on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
At the end of the day, will there not always be a major discrepancy between projected tax revenues and what we actually receive?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
In paragraph 14, you point out that tax policy in Scotland has increasingly diverged from that in the rest of the UK—that has been so for a number of years now—but HMRC has not yet assessed the impact of that or what it would cost to do so. Why?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Over a number of years now, I have repeatedly brought up my concerns about the figures that are behind the tax collecting. Gareth Davies mentioned working on some aspects of this, but consistently, right across the board, there seem to be an awful lot of assumptions and estimates and so on made and it is quite difficult to see how they would result in an accurate figure. Just to remind you, the service level agreement states:
“HMRC will identify the Scottish taxpayer population and collect from it the correct rates of SIT to ensure the Scottish Government receives the correct amount of income tax revenue each year.”
There are lots of other clauses on the same thing, but to me it all rotates around the key word, “correct”. I will take a high-level look at the issue and go through a few of the points of concern that I have picked out. I would be interested in your comments. It is not that making an estimate or an assumption is wrong; it is the sheer number of them. On occasion, you make an assumption based on an estimate, which to me must multiply the divergence and the inaccuracy of that figure. For example, in paragraph 12 of your report you say that HMRC successfully matched 72.9 per cent of address records. What is the equivalent figure south of the border?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
So you have no idea?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
You mentioned one aspect there, which is the behavioural changes, but there must be a process already in place across the UK to assess the behavioural change that any taxation increase or decrease might have.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Has there been an assessment of that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Correct.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
What does that mean?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
What you are saying, in effect, is that the Scottish Government’s action of not approving the expenses triggered the section 22 report.