The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2811 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. Let us move on. We have talked about risk management and governance arrangements. The thing that stands out in the audit report is where you state that there were
“significant delays to the commencement and completion of reviews that were agreed within the 2023/2024 internal audit plan.”
In paragraph 19 on page 9 of the report, you say that
“internal audit was unable to complete enough reviews to provide an opinion on the overall risk management, control and governance arrangements”.
That is pretty sweeping. Could I get a bit more information on that, to get a better understanding of where the issues arose? Was it a capacity issue in FMPG, an issue with the auditors, or a combination of both? How did that come about?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
You said that internal audit could not do sufficient reviews to give a proper audit opinion. Can you boil that down to a percentage? Did you get half or a quarter of the reviews done, or is it that, across the board, the reviews were not really completed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one final question on the matter. I can understand that for an organisation that had not, in its existing culture, had an internal audit function, there would be difficulties in adjusting to and taking part in that.
Are you satisfied that sufficient progress is being made in order that the 2025-26 internal audit function will deliver what is required?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
So far, you have not described a plethora of committees. They are the sort of committees that you would expect to see: the human resources committee, the audit committee and so on. Why is that putting so much pressure on the board?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Beattie
We put a lot of focus on planting for the future and the difference between non-native and native woodland planting. However, in recent times, some people have said to me that we need to think further ahead than that. Some woodlands, whether they are native or non-native, will not survive climate change, so, for the long term, we will have to plan for different species. The question is, which species do we plan for and how do we go about that? I have not seen great focus on that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I am the MSP for Midlothian North and Musselburgh.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Good. I will leave that just now, but I have one final question about the financial settlement for the former chief executive. As you said, Auditor General, the total cost to the public purse was £105,488. You stated in your report that
“The Commission should have taken more time to consider the wider options”.
Did WICS provide any explanation about why it did not take longer to consider the options? The option that it chose to push through quickly virtually indemnified the chief executive against any repercussions from what was happening, because there was a settlement agreement that covers both parties. He was virtually given a get-out-of-jail-free card. What explanation was given for why WICS narrowed the matter down so quickly, almost within days?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I will ask you a couple of quick questions. We have talked about the changes that are taking place in WICS. In paragraph 84 on page 35 of the annual audit report, you talk about what has been done to address financial management weaknesses in particular. How long do you anticipate that it will take for financial management and a focus on value for money to be embedded across the organisation to the extent that they become business as usual?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will stay on the financial side. Paragraph 8 on page 6 of the section 22 report talks about the three items of expenditure that did not meet the requirements of the SPFM. Paragraph 70 on page 32 of the annual audit report says that WICS sought retrospective approval from the Scottish Government’s sponsor division. It did not receive that retrospective approval.
Given the concerns that arose during the committee’s scrutiny of the 2022-23 audit report regarding the Scottish Government’s previous retrospective approval of expenditure, are you content that WICS’s subsequent request for retrospective approval has been handled appropriately by the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Some of my colleagues also want to come in on this issue, so I will hand back to you, convener.