Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 17 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3016 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Colin Beattie

If these are separate subsidiaries, appointing their own auditors and all the rest of it, to what extent does Audit Scotland have an overview of what is going on under the surface?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Colin Beattie

To be clear on that point, am I correct that Audit Scotland would not look at the audit reports on any company that has a majority of non-college related directors?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Colin Beattie

Talking of which, I had better get back on track with this particular issue. In key message 2, on page 3 of your report, you talk about the college failing

“to draw up and agree contracts for expenditure totalling over £900,000”.

How many contracts does that refer to?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Colin Beattie

Yes; they are mentioned in the plural.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Colin Beattie

Given what you have said, and given that your report confirms that the college acknowledges that the transactions “should have been reported” and that they were not, did the college give any reason why the absence of a contract had not been reported?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Colin Beattie

It might be useful for the committee to see it.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Colin Beattie

I will begin with a simple question about paragraph 35, which says:

“The Bank’s ambitions extend to taking on a more active role in the private investment market.”

You write about “engagement” and “advice”, which I presume means giving advice, and about “investment arrangement activity” and “management of third-party capital”. Fairly wide-ranging skills are necessary to be able to do that. I have worked in investment banking and each of those areas is highly specialised. How will the bank bring together all the expertise to be able to support that ambition and how will that be balanced with its key role, as agreed with the Scottish Government?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Colin Beattie

I have one final point, on which you might be able to provide clarity. The bank receives an allocation for year 1, but drawdowns happen over a period that crosses the annual budgeting period. Therefore, I presume that there are mechanisms in place to ensure that any unallocated capital issued in year 1 can roll over to year 2.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Colin Beattie

Financial transactions are not part of the block grant. They have to be repaid, and the obligation to make the repayments is on the Scottish Government. Is there a back-to-back agreement with SNIB in connection with that?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Colin Beattie

Factually, you are absolutely right, convener. Mr Denholm has announced publicly his intention to retire, and I understand that the bank is making arrangements to recruit a new chief executive and has stated that Mr Denholm will remain with the bank in an advisory capacity into 2026, to support transition handover arrangements. If that is consistent with a smooth handover and the transfer of knowledge, and if the bank has the financial resources to allow for those arrangements, that feels appropriate.

On the issue of the turnover, it is perhaps inevitable that there will be a change of leadership in a new organisation that is establishing itself. More generally in the public sector, change and turnover—recruiting and retaining people in senior leadership roles—is challenging for public bodies, as we have commented to the committee in relation to the NHS. I have no further insight into the specifics of the turnover and can refer only to the bank’s public statements—which, I am sure, the committee has seen—about why there has been a change of leadership.