The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3016 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I am keen to understand the relationship between the work of the local council and the body that is providing the funding, or a great part of the funding, which is the Government. There seems to be an element of isolation.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Given that you say that the average major project takes approximately five years and that, during that time, costs will probably escalate—as you say, you find things that you did not expect and so on, so the cost goes up—at what point during those five years do you get certainty that you will have enough funding for the scheme? That process in itself is not cost free, because there will be consultancies and other work going on, which cost money.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Could a better mechanism be put in place to manage cost escalation? That is obviously a big issue at the moment, but the fact is that, over any five-year period, you are going to get inflation built into materials and all the rest of it. Could that be better managed?
10:00Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I think that this is a question for Mr Brannen. Looking at the existing schemes and the schemes that are currently being considered as part of cycle 2, can you tell us when funding certainty will be in place for those projects?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
That is helpful. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
How do you engage with councils on existing projects such as the Musselburgh flood protection system, which is in my constituency? A number of schemes that I have looked at, including that one, started at one size and gradually grew legs and became much bigger. As far as I can see, those changes are developed locally, and it seems that there is no Government co-operation, oversight or input into that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Some of Mr Boyd’s comments lead on to my final question. There has been some suggestion that the criteria for assessing major flood schemes might favour more affluent areas. That might be because the criteria look at capital values or whatever; I do not know what the criteria are, but that is the suggestion that has been made. Which criteria might be used to appraise investment in future flood schemes in terms of value for money, but also taking into account inequalities and wider benefits? Perhaps Mr Boyd might like to comment on that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I would like to talk a little bit about funding for the major flood schemes. The Auditor General’s report indicates that
“the funding mechanism for major flood schemes is not fit for purpose”.
That is quite a strong statement. The report also says that the funding mechanisms lack the appropriate safeguards to manage risks relating to delays and cost increases. That is worrying, given the nature of what we are facing. What mechanisms will be put in place to ensure that future risks of delays and cost increases are better managed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. Is the internal audit being done in-house?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I mean, £1 million is a lot of errors. What is the total balance sheet for the college?