Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 January 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2875 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Colin Beattie

The fact is that we know if an error has happened only when it is identified. You are just talking about estimates. Are they figures that we should be concerned about? Are they figures that have somehow have to be accounted for? How does it work?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Colin Beattie

Do we have an actual figure for how much is written off? We are not talking about a write-off figure here; it is just an estimate of what the losses might be, based on past experience. Do we have an actual figure for that? We obviously have figures for sums recovered and actions taken, but some is irrecoverable. How do we identify that?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Colin Beattie

I can hear you perfectly.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Colin Beattie

Apparently the better value came at a cost of £14.4 million.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Colin Beattie

I will direct my questions to Paul Lowe; if it is appropriate, he can bounce them on to others.

On the face of it, the financial impact of £21.6 million seems like a lot of money. You have mentioned that some of that was used positively to invest in other preparations. I am struggling a bit with that, because we see that the increased supplier costs are £14.4 million, because of the extension of supplier contracts and an increase in the cost of goods. What goods are so significant that they contribute to that £14.4 million, and how has that been turned into a benefit, when it is the suppliers that are getting the increased costs?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS Highland”

Meeting date: 13 January 2022

Colin Beattie

So, the answer is yes.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS Highland”

Meeting date: 13 January 2022

Colin Beattie

It seems extraordinary that one health board is getting such a significant uplift. I am not questioning whether it deserves it; I am just saying that it seems disproportionate.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS Highland”

Meeting date: 13 January 2022

Colin Beattie

In effect, therefore, the Covid moneys are masking the underlying financial issues to some extent. Is that correct?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Bòrd na Gàidhlig”

Meeting date: 13 January 2022

Colin Beattie

To put it more simply, do you consider the board’s capacity to be a risk to it?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS Highland”

Meeting date: 13 January 2022

Colin Beattie

I am interested to know whether, in your opinion, the NHS Highland situation reflects fairness.