The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2922 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
But surely that variable could be applied to almost any part of the Scottish budget, and not just the part that we are discussing. We have no control over the changes that happen at Westminster and the impact on our budget. We cannot make contingencies for every single possible potential change.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Have you formed any view on whether the different approach by the Scottish Government represents value for money, given the potential impact on public services?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
I would like to circle back to diversity. Paragraph 60 of the Auditor General’s report says:
“Issues of diversity remain in some boards, both in terms of protected characteristics and in bringing in the perspective of people who use services.”
How can that situation be improved? There is a great difficulty in getting non-executive directors at the best of times. I have had the experience of jobs being re-advertised and so on when trying to increase that pool. Getting diverse representation is quite complex, because diversity is very diverse. How do you reach out to the different groupings that you would like to see represented on the boards?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on a little bit. The Auditor General’s report highlights the turnover of senior staff in 2023-24 and 2024-25, with 12 new chief executives, including 10 new chief executives of territorial boards. In addition, more than 50 per cent of integration joint boards have reported a turnover in their senior leadership. That is a huge challenge. What process is in place to manage stability, and is it successful? You need synergy among the senior management to be able to run a successful organisation, and recruiting so many new people will obviously create, at least temporarily, a slight hiatus in the process. How can the appointment process ensure that the chairs and non-executives are able to provide stability during a period of leadership change?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
The high level of turnover among senior executives must create issues of stability and continuity, and there does not seem to be much in place to manage that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Is the process that the code of conduct requires robust enough for the job?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Is there a template for the appraisal process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
It is freehand, if you like.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Would you say that the framework helps with aligning national policies and local planning?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Colin Beattie
I move on to the slightly more difficult area of sponsorship. The committee has come across sponsorship failures again and again in various areas of the public sector on which we have received reports from the Auditor General. How is the sponsorship system working? Does it have adequate oversight of the individual boards? How does that relate to the interventions and escalations that have been taking place?