Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2603 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

Other than the fact that the Government is still evaluating its forward plans, was there a specific reason why it decided to continue to support private providers?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

Paragraph 87 of the section 22 report says:

“NHS NSS has committed to ensuring retrospective contract approval and monitoring this through its established governance group.”

How is that progressing, particularly in respect of the contracts that are described and the issues raised about them?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

I will take a slightly different angle. Your “Crofting Commission Report to the Audit and Finance Committee on the ‘Audit Dimensions and Best Value’ for the year ended 31 March 2021” states that the commissioners

“were apparently unaware of the fact that the Commission can employ staff in their own right, rather than through seconding staff from the Scottish Government.”

Is that correct?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

How many of the commission’s staff, particularly at senior level, were seconded from the Scottish Government? To what extent did that secondment of employees lead to a blurring of the lines in the relationship between the commission’s management team and the sponsorship function?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

You have to open the book first to see what those are.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

After seeing so many failures, I certainly encourage you to consider looking at the whole rather than the individual parts.

I will carry on with one or two more questions. The report raised concerns about the leadership of the former convener of the Crofting Commission and, clearly, that person did not really recognise the distinction between their role and that of management. Do you think that the role of the convener has now been set out clearly enough? Is it understood by the current convener?

09:45  

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

The report states that the former convener “retained the confidence” of the board in spite of all the issues around his leadership, such as “failing to appropriately chair” board meetings and arranging private decision-making meetings. That raises a question that was briefly touched on earlier: were those board members offered, and did they attend, the training that is usually made available for board members? That would have equipped them to challenge some of the actions that were taken by the convener.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

It would have been the responsibility of the convener to ensure that training took place, of course.

I want to ask about sponsorship. A bit of clarification might be needed here, Auditor General. The report states that the Scottish Government’s sponsorship division

“appeared to view its relationship of consequence as being with the Senior Management Team rather than the Convener.”

Earlier, you said that the sponsorship division’s relationship was with the CEO, which is slightly different. Perhaps you could clarify that.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

Could we have clarification as to whether it is in fact a secondment or simply a matter of terms and conditions?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

The relationship between the Scottish Government and an NDPB is kind of changed if Scottish Government staff go in and hold a position in the body—at least, it is in my mind—so clarification on that would be good.