The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2792 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
If we are talking about the need to redesign IJBs, surely there must be a joined-up effort in taking that forward. You cannot look away from that. Local councils and the NHS must get together and either come up with a new formula or accept that additional funding will be needed to meet those needs.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, I would like to look at IJBs. Clearly, they are a very significant factor in the particular case of NHS Grampian, although that is probably true right across the board, given previous reports that we have had from you.
In paragraph 8 of the section 22 report, you talk about NHS Grampian successfully delivering £15.6 million of additional savings in 2024-25. However, over the same period, it provided extra funding of £22.4 million—a huge sum of money—to the IJBs in its area. Where does the responsibility lie for addressing overspends in IJBs, and what actions are being taken to manage that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
Is there not a circular issue here for the NHS? If you do not provide adequate care services, there will be bed blocking, which will have an impact further down the line. Are you not just making a new problem?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
So, the board is working to the plan that has been rejected because it projects a deficit of £33 million.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
Has that revised plan gone to the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
It told the board to continue working with its existing plan in the interim, while looking for other sources of savings.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
Let me summarise it for my own clarity. At the moment, the board is working towards a deficit of £33 million. That is what it is budgeting against, but there is a notional £25 million deficit that it has to achieve by as-yet-unspecified means. That was the position in June. Has there been any indication that it is likely to improve on the present situation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
From the audit point of view, do you consider that there is an adequate level of support?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
What you are talking about moves us on to the next question that I wanted to ask. In your report, you said that the board is still to prepare sufficiently detailed plans to show that it will achieve financial sustainability. My question was going to be about the lack of progress on those plans and whether anything jumped out at you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Colin Beattie
When Fiona comes in, perhaps it will be possible for her to comment on this. After seven years at level 3, getting all the support during that period, and presumably after exploring every conceivable possibility of achieving savings—non-recurring savings, in particular, must have been explored by now—what is left for the board to do? Where does it go? We are also talking about its making recurring savings of 3 per cent. How feasible is that? Is it realistic, or is it just pie in the sky?