The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2792 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Were you still paying any of those workers in the period that the funicular was closed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Were they paid throughout the whole period that the funicular was closed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Remind me how often that group meets?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one last question. How do you measure the long-term economic impact of the funicular and its associated businesses?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, do these ambiguities have to be resolved at Government level, through legislation, or do the different parties simply need to get together and work out between themselves what the parameters are?
11:15Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
So, there is no common standard for measuring the success or failure of a flood scheme.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Does anybody?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Does SEPA have enough data to be able to effectively carry out its functions? We are talking about information being available at the council level but not necessarily being collated with any uniform methodology or, as it would appear in some cases, not being collated at all. For example, how does SEPA assess the flood risk in areas that have flood management systems in place? How does SEPA square that circle?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
The Auditor General’s report seems to make it fairly clear that, to some extent, each flood scheme is operating in a silo. There does not seem to be a lot of co-operation or transfer of best practice, although you have shown some examples of good practice in innovation and collaboration work. For example, case study 2 looks at the Tweed Forum and case study 3 refers to work done by the Metropolitan Glasgow Strategic Drainage Partnership. Why have those projects been successful, and why has that success not been reflected in other areas?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Colin Beattie
Correct me if I get my figures wrong, but my understanding is that the last time that the funicular made a profit was broadly 10 years ago. Since then, most of the time, the funicular has been closed. You said earlier that the GVA of the funicular was £3.8 million, but how can you calculate that when it has been closed for such a long time?