The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2603 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
What are the implications of that? Financial transactions have to be repaid, and that obligation is on the Scottish Government and not necessarily on SNIB, unless there is a back-to-back agreement on that. It is likely that, as those transactions come to maturity, that will, in effect, reduce SNIB’s capital, because it will have to return the money to the Scottish Government, which will have an impact on future investment. Given that it has been receiving financial transactions for a number of years, the cumulative effect of those payments down the line could be quite significant.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Yes. It all hangs together.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
If I recall correctly, financial transactions have already been reduced somewhat over the past few years. I think that most of them now go to the bank, do they not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
That was the subject of my next question.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I can see that there are some questions for the bank.
I will move on. The bank has made pretty good progress on covering its operational costs from its own income, but the ability to continue to generate that income to cover its costs is pretty closely tied to the continuing supply of capital from the Scottish Government. How confident are you that that funding will be sustained? What would be the impact on the bank if the capital allocations were to fall short?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Elements such as giving advice, presumably on how to invest capital, are highly-specialised, highly-paid areas in which people get mega bonuses and so on. How is that compatible with SNIB and, to be blunt, how can it afford that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
It is an extremely competitive area that has some really big players. There are a lot of questions about where in the existing market SNIB might fit—or, indeed, whether there is a place that it can fit or find a niche to take on.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Based on what you have said, it seems that the bank is aware of those risks and is managing them, to the extent that it can.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I am a bit concerned about one particular area. Last year, witnesses told us that SCAD does not conduct horizon scanning of at-risk companies, sectors or whatever and that requests for support simply get referred back. You have referred, for example, to the enterprise boards and so on as being one of the conduits. Is that not a high-risk approach? If you are just waiting for things to come in, do you not risk missing critical issues out in the market?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I was interested in your reference to theatre groups, which I would never have linked to what you do. What are the criteria for getting involved in the cultural side of things? Is it the number of staff? Is it the impact on the local economy?